Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9797761" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>It's not specific to common law to have complicated exemptions. Because oversimplifying texts will either lead to unwanted side effect -- for example, if you forgot to add an earthquake exemption to the "don't build houses that kill you", then a lot of people will go to jail when an earthquake happens -- and also, "building houses" isn't just a matter of physical injury. You might want rules to protect the environment (don't use pollutant in the building), the historical value of another building (don't build a jarring gaudy building just in front of a historically significant building), the rights of neighours (if you buy a house in a quiet residential district, you might be able to convince politicians that you're harmed if a heavy industry is built next to your house)...</p><p></p><p>The most recent rewrite of the building code in France, a purely civil law country, dates back from 2018 and it isn't simpler than common law country regulations. I'd guess it's even more stringent than most common law countries.</p><p></p><p>WRT to old regulations, it can happen in civil law countries, too: I still find very funny to pass judgements mentionning a 1539 royal edict -- even in civil law countries, you can get some surviving pieces of legislation. Basically, it is unwise to say "everything until now is void and here is the new system": you might mistakenly make legal some awful things. When the French authorities in 1945 wanted to undo the legislations passed during WWII by both the occupying German forces and the collaborationist Vichy government, they cancelled a few specific texts but dared not undo everything without prior individual review: saying "everything done by unlawful authorities is void" was considered, but unlawful authorities did a lot of harmless and even useful things, like deciding on local speed limit, and they didn't want to just cancel everything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9797761, member: 42856"] It's not specific to common law to have complicated exemptions. Because oversimplifying texts will either lead to unwanted side effect -- for example, if you forgot to add an earthquake exemption to the "don't build houses that kill you", then a lot of people will go to jail when an earthquake happens -- and also, "building houses" isn't just a matter of physical injury. You might want rules to protect the environment (don't use pollutant in the building), the historical value of another building (don't build a jarring gaudy building just in front of a historically significant building), the rights of neighours (if you buy a house in a quiet residential district, you might be able to convince politicians that you're harmed if a heavy industry is built next to your house)... The most recent rewrite of the building code in France, a purely civil law country, dates back from 2018 and it isn't simpler than common law country regulations. I'd guess it's even more stringent than most common law countries. WRT to old regulations, it can happen in civil law countries, too: I still find very funny to pass judgements mentionning a 1539 royal edict -- even in civil law countries, you can get some surviving pieces of legislation. Basically, it is unwise to say "everything until now is void and here is the new system": you might mistakenly make legal some awful things. When the French authorities in 1945 wanted to undo the legislations passed during WWII by both the occupying German forces and the collaborationist Vichy government, they cancelled a few specific texts but dared not undo everything without prior individual review: saying "everything done by unlawful authorities is void" was considered, but unlawful authorities did a lot of harmless and even useful things, like deciding on local speed limit, and they didn't want to just cancel everything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
Top