Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gorgon Zee" data-source="post: 9798699" data-attributes="member: 75787"><p>[USER=42856]@Jfdlsjfd[/USER] -- as a data professional with several decades of experience in this area, here are some suggestions on how to make your arguments more helpful. The large wall of info you produced above will be -- and I'd argue <em>should </em>be -- ignored by most people. Here are some ways to make it more useful:</p><p></p><p><strong>Use a small set of measures as your main metrics. Use the same aggregation in every chart and statistic unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For this discussion, your metric should be wages / CPI. (Inflation adjusted wages). </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You aggregation function must be the median. This data is highly skewed, so means are at best unhelpful and at worst deliberately misleading.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Please for the love of everything don't say "the median and the average" -- it makes it look like you think the only average is the mean. Instead say "both averages, the mean and the median,"</li> </ul><p><strong>Cite every chart and table</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For this data, all the US data should come form the BLS or entities using BLS data.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For other countries, use their official stats office or entities using that data.</li> </ul><p>----------</p><p>Most of your charts are about income, which is irrelevant to this discussion (if you want to make it relevant, be prepared for a lot of work to define what income is in a meaningful way. Ignoring investment income is a classic way for people to say "see, rich people actually do pay fair taxes", for example). Your data is mostly uncited, so I cannot trust it. And you switch between means and medians continuously (hint: charts showing "fractions of" or "shares of" are all about sums of data, which are relevant only to discussion of means, not medians).</p><p></p><p>A good way to organize your argument is to focus on a single set of data, show a key chart or table and then a few examples that add detail to your argument. That makes it more likely you'll have a productive discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gorgon Zee, post: 9798699, member: 75787"] [USER=42856]@Jfdlsjfd[/USER] -- as a data professional with several decades of experience in this area, here are some suggestions on how to make your arguments more helpful. The large wall of info you produced above will be -- and I'd argue [I]should [/I]be -- ignored by most people. Here are some ways to make it more useful: [B]Use a small set of measures as your main metrics. Use the same aggregation in every chart and statistic unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise[/B] [LIST] [*]For this discussion, your metric should be wages / CPI. (Inflation adjusted wages). [*]You aggregation function must be the median. This data is highly skewed, so means are at best unhelpful and at worst deliberately misleading. [*]Please for the love of everything don't say "the median and the average" -- it makes it look like you think the only average is the mean. Instead say "both averages, the mean and the median," [/LIST] [B]Cite every chart and table[/B] [LIST] [*]For this data, all the US data should come form the BLS or entities using BLS data. [*]For other countries, use their official stats office or entities using that data. [/LIST] ---------- Most of your charts are about income, which is irrelevant to this discussion (if you want to make it relevant, be prepared for a lot of work to define what income is in a meaningful way. Ignoring investment income is a classic way for people to say "see, rich people actually do pay fair taxes", for example). Your data is mostly uncited, so I cannot trust it. And you switch between means and medians continuously (hint: charts showing "fractions of" or "shares of" are all about sums of data, which are relevant only to discussion of means, not medians). A good way to organize your argument is to focus on a single set of data, show a key chart or table and then a few examples that add detail to your argument. That makes it more likely you'll have a productive discussion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
Top