Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7057671" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Because that's what you've indicated the results of a success would be -- the finding of a non-magical mace. What, praytell, would be the big reward that accompanied the finding of a mace?</p><p></p><p>Look, I see that the framing was of something big -- the return should have something interesting involved to justify the framing. But the check was to find a mace. A nonmagical mace. That's not high stakes, that's pretty darn low stakes. You didn't offer anything on the success side to warrant the high cost failure. If you want a high cost failure on one side, you should balance it with a big reward on the other -- not a mace.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The arbitrary bit was that you could have decided to put anything else there -- a monster lurking, a clue to some other puzzle, anything, but instead choice, arbitrarily, to provide evidence that completely reframed the player's backstory (you authored part of the player's story for him) and that invalidated one of the player's main goals in play. That's looking pretty arbitrary from here. Did you skip telling us the part where the player asked for such a possible outcome? Had I been the player, I would have been upset that the looking for a mace had that result, especially if it was spur of the moment.</p><p></p><p>The player knew he was risking one of their goals and a major change to their backstory when they went looking for a mace? Okay. I suppose if you told them you'd negate one of their goals if they failed the check to look for a mace and they went with it, I don't have a problem with that. However, you haven't said this up front, yet, that you established the stakes before the check was made.</p><p></p><p>It's very, very difficult to argue a point based on your presentation when you don't present the whole story.</p><p></p><p>But, again, on this failure, did you author that the brother was evil or did the player? Finding cursed arrows, even knowing they were made by the brother, would not prove guilt to me. There are a ton of other explanation that fit, especially in a game where facts are ephemeral until a failed search for a mace occurs and then they pop out and influence past events.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7057671, member: 16814"] Because that's what you've indicated the results of a success would be -- the finding of a non-magical mace. What, praytell, would be the big reward that accompanied the finding of a mace? Look, I see that the framing was of something big -- the return should have something interesting involved to justify the framing. But the check was to find a mace. A nonmagical mace. That's not high stakes, that's pretty darn low stakes. You didn't offer anything on the success side to warrant the high cost failure. If you want a high cost failure on one side, you should balance it with a big reward on the other -- not a mace. The arbitrary bit was that you could have decided to put anything else there -- a monster lurking, a clue to some other puzzle, anything, but instead choice, arbitrarily, to provide evidence that completely reframed the player's backstory (you authored part of the player's story for him) and that invalidated one of the player's main goals in play. That's looking pretty arbitrary from here. Did you skip telling us the part where the player asked for such a possible outcome? Had I been the player, I would have been upset that the looking for a mace had that result, especially if it was spur of the moment. The player knew he was risking one of their goals and a major change to their backstory when they went looking for a mace? Okay. I suppose if you told them you'd negate one of their goals if they failed the check to look for a mace and they went with it, I don't have a problem with that. However, you haven't said this up front, yet, that you established the stakes before the check was made. It's very, very difficult to argue a point based on your presentation when you don't present the whole story. But, again, on this failure, did you author that the brother was evil or did the player? Finding cursed arrows, even knowing they were made by the brother, would not prove guilt to me. There are a ton of other explanation that fit, especially in a game where facts are ephemeral until a failed search for a mace occurs and then they pop out and influence past events. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
Top