Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Campbell" data-source="post: 7068670" data-attributes="member: 16586"><p>Just using this as a jumping on point because I have something to say.</p><p></p><p>I do not think it is particularly helpful to think of this discussion in terms of a debate with sides. As I tend to view things it is often counterproductive and leads us down roads where we engage in points and counterpoints, rather than meaningfully chewing over the underlying ideas, really thinking them over, and responding with how we view things.</p><p></p><p>One of the hardest parts of being involved in these sorts of discussions on the internet is the pervasive culture of debate. In my own posts I try to do a couple of things that I believe help to counter the usual effects of internet debate culture.</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I do not engage in multiquote point by point analysis. I believe this helps me to stay focused on engaging ideas over engaging in debate. It also creates some emotional distance between what I am responding to and the ideas I am putting forward.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Whenever possible I try to highlight differences of opinion between myself and those I broadly agree with in some ways. Often I find these are the most fruitful avenues to go down. As an example, in this thread I have highlighted how I am not always particularly interested in constant conflict and escalation in the "go to the action" variety. In the future I shall strive to do this more.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> When I engage in lines of inquiry I try to do so with genuine interest. I really want to know what people have to say about things. That is no guarantee that I will necesarily agree with the things they have to say, but I will strive to engage with what they have to say. I do not always succeed in this endeavor.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> When people say things that I find particularly irksome I try to take some time to chew on it until there is some emotional distance. This is a constant struggle for me. My passions runs deep and my temper often gets the best of me.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> I strive to only speak for myself and not for others. This can sometimes be very difficult. There are posters on this board I regard as friends on some level, and I am deeply protective of my friends. We are still not like the same person though and often see things very differently.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I am not saying that you have to stop engaging in debate and move more towards analysis. It's my favored approach to discussion and scholarship of all sorts, but I cannot tell anyone how or what they should think. I can only say the things that I think in a way that I believe will shed light on certain things. I mainly just wanted everyone to know where I am coming from and the sort of approach I will be striving for in the future.</p><p></p><p>There are many lines of discussion that I feel are worth responding to, but I am unsure that within this thread is necessarily the best place to do so. Later today I will have some additional meta commentary that I believe will help build some understanding of where I specifically am coming from.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Campbell, post: 7068670, member: 16586"] Just using this as a jumping on point because I have something to say. I do not think it is particularly helpful to think of this discussion in terms of a debate with sides. As I tend to view things it is often counterproductive and leads us down roads where we engage in points and counterpoints, rather than meaningfully chewing over the underlying ideas, really thinking them over, and responding with how we view things. One of the hardest parts of being involved in these sorts of discussions on the internet is the pervasive culture of debate. In my own posts I try to do a couple of things that I believe help to counter the usual effects of internet debate culture. [LIST] [*]I do not engage in multiquote point by point analysis. I believe this helps me to stay focused on engaging ideas over engaging in debate. It also creates some emotional distance between what I am responding to and the ideas I am putting forward. [*] Whenever possible I try to highlight differences of opinion between myself and those I broadly agree with in some ways. Often I find these are the most fruitful avenues to go down. As an example, in this thread I have highlighted how I am not always particularly interested in constant conflict and escalation in the "go to the action" variety. In the future I shall strive to do this more. [*] When I engage in lines of inquiry I try to do so with genuine interest. I really want to know what people have to say about things. That is no guarantee that I will necesarily agree with the things they have to say, but I will strive to engage with what they have to say. I do not always succeed in this endeavor. [*] When people say things that I find particularly irksome I try to take some time to chew on it until there is some emotional distance. This is a constant struggle for me. My passions runs deep and my temper often gets the best of me. [*] I strive to only speak for myself and not for others. This can sometimes be very difficult. There are posters on this board I regard as friends on some level, and I am deeply protective of my friends. We are still not like the same person though and often see things very differently. [/LIST] I am not saying that you have to stop engaging in debate and move more towards analysis. It's my favored approach to discussion and scholarship of all sorts, but I cannot tell anyone how or what they should think. I can only say the things that I think in a way that I believe will shed light on certain things. I mainly just wanted everyone to know where I am coming from and the sort of approach I will be striving for in the future. There are many lines of discussion that I feel are worth responding to, but I am unsure that within this thread is necessarily the best place to do so. Later today I will have some additional meta commentary that I believe will help build some understanding of where I specifically am coming from. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
Top