Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 7082871" data-attributes="member: 23751">Because the advisor would have to be retarded not to attempt to mitigate the damage from his outing himself.And he was revealed.&nbsp; Challenge won.&nbsp; That really has no bearing on what the advisor does next, though.&nbsp; If he attempts to mitigate the damage, it in no way tarnishes that win.I don't understand eliminating the possibility of people being outed or outing themselves and being able to mitigate that damage.&nbsp; That seems like a perfectly reasonable and viable path for the game to go down, and one that is quite fun.And he was wrong.&nbsp; That success is untarnished by any mitigation after the fact.&nbsp; They are two separate events.Our difference here isn't the system used to get to the result.&nbsp; It's that you seem to be taking two separate events, outing and mitigation, and turning them into one event, and I'm taking the position that they are two separate events.&nbsp; If the are separate, then you are not bound to have the advisor behave in a retarded manner.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 7082871, member: 23751"] Because the advisor would have to be retarded not to attempt to mitigate the damage from his outing himself. And he was revealed. Challenge won. That really has no bearing on what the advisor does next, though. If he attempts to mitigate the damage, it in no way tarnishes that win. I don't understand eliminating the possibility of people being outed or outing themselves and being able to mitigate that damage. That seems like a perfectly reasonable and viable path for the game to go down, and one that is quite fun. And he was wrong. That success is untarnished by any mitigation after the fact. They are two separate events. Our difference here isn't the system used to get to the result. It's that you seem to be taking two separate events, outing and mitigation, and turning them into one event, and I'm taking the position that they are two separate events. If the are separate, then you are not bound to have the advisor behave in a retarded manner. [/QUOTE]

Verification