Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 7093439" data-attributes="member: 6778044"><p>Yes to world building and using somebody else's world building.</p><p></p><p>No to prepare adventures that put designs on how players should interact with them, and rarely somebody else's adventures, almost never as written.</p><p></p><p>I can't stand spotlight balancing, nor do I advocate any narrative. Add in that I'm not particularly concerned about game balance in the same way others are.</p><p></p><p>I don't have any specific expectations that a player should enjoy exploration of the world, although I hope they do. How the world is explored is really up to the players, and I can adjust to their preferred style. What I do hope they'll enjoy more is the exploration of their character.</p><p></p><p>Working as a unified group makes things easier, but I'm also happy to run multiple parallel campaigns with one, two, or more characters at a time, and bring them together if/when appropriate. Nor do I think that there are parts of the story meant to highlight anybody (no spotlighting) so they are free to interact with what they'd like.</p><p></p><p>Oh, yeah, I play D&D. That's about as mainstream as it gets.</p><p></p><p>However, my approach is one that's developed over 35+ years of DMing, with home-brew A&D having set the stage so to speak. So the development of the world and what I expect of the rules is built from that. The 5e rules are just simpler and more elegant - with modifications.</p><p></p><p>Having grown up with the game during a period where home-brew was published monthly in Dragon magazine, I consider my approach "mainline" in the sense that the game has always been (to me) malleable and flexible, the intent to make it work for you.</p><p></p><p>I also acknowledge that somebody who starts playing now will expect relatively simple rules with fast advancement, and be able to pick up a "campaign" (AP) to play a character more or less from start to finish. If you started in 4e, then you'll have different expectations from the game than if you started in 3e. I think 4e was more prescriptive about the play style. You pretty much had to use a battle mat, whether you wanted to or not, for example. I think 3/3.5e required quite a bit more investment in learning the rules, only because there were so many variables. AD&D (at least up until the <em>Complete</em> series of books came out, and 5e, are much simpler from the player's perspective, for different reasons.</p><p></p><p>In other words, D&D is as mainstream as you choose to make it. But I get what you're saying, because when I run public campaigns, I feel very restricted in what I can do (or not do) as a DM. If I choose to limit races or classes, it's often a big deal, for example. What I think it really is, is the expectations that come with D&D. Although those expectations can vary widely, there are a number of things (like the ones you mention) that tend to be relatively common.</p><p></p><p>My solution? Well, one of them is that I love new players. I love helping them put together a character, and letting them loose in the world. No need to read through the rule-book - just tell me what your character does. The world is similar to ours in terms of physics, and you can really do, or attempt anything you'd like. We'll tell you how to figure out whether you succeed or not.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this sounds an awful lot like AD&D - the DM worries about the rules, you can focus on your character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilbranteloth, post: 7093439, member: 6778044"] Yes to world building and using somebody else's world building. No to prepare adventures that put designs on how players should interact with them, and rarely somebody else's adventures, almost never as written. I can't stand spotlight balancing, nor do I advocate any narrative. Add in that I'm not particularly concerned about game balance in the same way others are. I don't have any specific expectations that a player should enjoy exploration of the world, although I hope they do. How the world is explored is really up to the players, and I can adjust to their preferred style. What I do hope they'll enjoy more is the exploration of their character. Working as a unified group makes things easier, but I'm also happy to run multiple parallel campaigns with one, two, or more characters at a time, and bring them together if/when appropriate. Nor do I think that there are parts of the story meant to highlight anybody (no spotlighting) so they are free to interact with what they'd like. Oh, yeah, I play D&D. That's about as mainstream as it gets. However, my approach is one that's developed over 35+ years of DMing, with home-brew A&D having set the stage so to speak. So the development of the world and what I expect of the rules is built from that. The 5e rules are just simpler and more elegant - with modifications. Having grown up with the game during a period where home-brew was published monthly in Dragon magazine, I consider my approach "mainline" in the sense that the game has always been (to me) malleable and flexible, the intent to make it work for you. I also acknowledge that somebody who starts playing now will expect relatively simple rules with fast advancement, and be able to pick up a "campaign" (AP) to play a character more or less from start to finish. If you started in 4e, then you'll have different expectations from the game than if you started in 3e. I think 4e was more prescriptive about the play style. You pretty much had to use a battle mat, whether you wanted to or not, for example. I think 3/3.5e required quite a bit more investment in learning the rules, only because there were so many variables. AD&D (at least up until the [I]Complete[/I] series of books came out, and 5e, are much simpler from the player's perspective, for different reasons. In other words, D&D is as mainstream as you choose to make it. But I get what you're saying, because when I run public campaigns, I feel very restricted in what I can do (or not do) as a DM. If I choose to limit races or classes, it's often a big deal, for example. What I think it really is, is the expectations that come with D&D. Although those expectations can vary widely, there are a number of things (like the ones you mention) that tend to be relatively common. My solution? Well, one of them is that I love new players. I love helping them put together a character, and letting them loose in the world. No need to read through the rule-book - just tell me what your character does. The world is similar to ours in terms of physics, and you can really do, or attempt anything you'd like. We'll tell you how to figure out whether you succeed or not. Of course, this sounds an awful lot like AD&D - the DM worries about the rules, you can focus on your character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
Top