Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 7098852" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>The skulker is seen doing things in the distance a few times before the party really interact with him, right? So, if nobody knows his motivation at that time why is he doing what he's doing? His motivation for doing those things has to come from somewhere...in this case, the DM...and thus DM speculation becomes for the moment hidden DM fact. And the players can then speculate as they wish.</p><p></p><p>The skulker is someone else, as in not the same individual at all? There's two yellow-robed guys? Is that what you mean?</p><p></p><p>If they are the same person, however, then the later "authoring" does in fact overwrite whatever was driving his actions when he was seen earlier. Nothing wrong with this as long as his "new" self would have done the same things seen earlier...but to claim there's no change from what he was previously based on is false. There is a change. Thing is, only you as DM know this.</p><p></p><p>Because as I just said, once the skulker attracts the party's attention by flying around in the distance, DM conjecture known only to the DM becomes DM fact known only to the DM. The idea is in place and being reflected in the fiction by the skulker doing whatever he's doing when the party see him.</p><p></p><p>Nobody is really being tricked here, in that the skulker's earlier actions are innocuous enough that retconning a different set of motivations onto him makes little real difference. EXCEPT, you have to ask yourself this: if the skulker had been operating under these "new" motivations all along would the party have seen him doing anything different than what they in fact saw? If yes, then both the players and their PCs have been (more or less) tricked or deceived.</p><p></p><p>There's quite a difference. Passwall doesn't care if there's a secret door there - it just makes an obvious way through by temporarily changing the architecture - where the Architecture check is based on what's been constructed into the building as noted on the DM's map (or bloody well should be - this idea of Schroedingers Secret Door just doesn't fly with me). Charm Person is the brute-force approach to diplomacy and information gathering (and not available to everyone).</p><p></p><p>That doesn't answer my question.</p><p></p><p>Can, in your system, an existing secret door simply be missed on a search? It's not about an absence of anything, it's about the presence of it being flat-out missed by the searcher (with or without possible consequences then or later).</p><p></p><p>Can there in fact be a blood-catching vessel in the room that the searcher just doesn't notice even though it might be in plain sight (we've all done this in real life!)?</p><p></p><p>Lanefan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 7098852, member: 29398"] The skulker is seen doing things in the distance a few times before the party really interact with him, right? So, if nobody knows his motivation at that time why is he doing what he's doing? His motivation for doing those things has to come from somewhere...in this case, the DM...and thus DM speculation becomes for the moment hidden DM fact. And the players can then speculate as they wish. The skulker is someone else, as in not the same individual at all? There's two yellow-robed guys? Is that what you mean? If they are the same person, however, then the later "authoring" does in fact overwrite whatever was driving his actions when he was seen earlier. Nothing wrong with this as long as his "new" self would have done the same things seen earlier...but to claim there's no change from what he was previously based on is false. There is a change. Thing is, only you as DM know this. Because as I just said, once the skulker attracts the party's attention by flying around in the distance, DM conjecture known only to the DM becomes DM fact known only to the DM. The idea is in place and being reflected in the fiction by the skulker doing whatever he's doing when the party see him. Nobody is really being tricked here, in that the skulker's earlier actions are innocuous enough that retconning a different set of motivations onto him makes little real difference. EXCEPT, you have to ask yourself this: if the skulker had been operating under these "new" motivations all along would the party have seen him doing anything different than what they in fact saw? If yes, then both the players and their PCs have been (more or less) tricked or deceived. There's quite a difference. Passwall doesn't care if there's a secret door there - it just makes an obvious way through by temporarily changing the architecture - where the Architecture check is based on what's been constructed into the building as noted on the DM's map (or bloody well should be - this idea of Schroedingers Secret Door just doesn't fly with me). Charm Person is the brute-force approach to diplomacy and information gathering (and not available to everyone). That doesn't answer my question. Can, in your system, an existing secret door simply be missed on a search? It's not about an absence of anything, it's about the presence of it being flat-out missed by the searcher (with or without possible consequences then or later). Can there in fact be a blood-catching vessel in the room that the searcher just doesn't notice even though it might be in plain sight (we've all done this in real life!)? Lanefan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Judgement calls vs "railroading"
Top