Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TheAuldGrump" data-source="post: 3004175" data-attributes="member: 6957">And thanks in turn for your own. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />I actually like the NG version of Wilderlands, and find this development rather more than annoying. While I may never run a campaign with the setting I do own it, and do not feel that I have wasted my money. While I do not yet own City State I also intend to get that when I can, which may well result in my running short campaigns in the setting.Conversion from D20 to C&C is actually easier than the reverse - one is removing information (largely skills) while the other is reengineering the NPCs and monsters. The lack of a true skill system is my greatest problem with C&C, and why, after looking at the book at the store I put it back on the shelf - I do not feel enough of an urge to go back to old school character generation. I like having skills, and do not like using a cookie cutter to create my characters or NPCs.So, I will not be purchasing this new version of an existing setting.Is that more constructive and insightful?The Auld Grump</blockquote>