Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
JUIBLEX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6847567" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Good to hear, Dave.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I honestly think the best way of thinking about it is the coldly analytical sober way:</p><p></p><p>Q. What is a CR 25 creature to a Level 20 party? </p><p>A. A creature five steps above their level. Nothing more, nothing less.</p><p></p><p>Meaning that I'm thinking you want different... layers, tiers or what have you. </p><p></p><p>A CR 25 Demon Lord is supposed to be more "epic" than a regular vanilla CR 25 monster. </p><p></p><p>But I don't think that's the best way to look at it. </p><p></p><p>All CR 25 critters are epic. That's why their CR is 21+.</p><p></p><p>Whenever you want strong lieutenants for your epic Lords of Doom, use CR 11-20 critters. </p><p></p><p>But resist the temptation to add in rank-and-file CR 21+ monsters. The game basically ends at or near level 20, and so anything above that CR should be unique or nearly unique. </p><p></p><p>That means accepting that a CR 25 demon lord will be somewhat of a threat to a level 20 party. Not more, not less. </p><p></p><p>How big a threat? That depends on the party optimization. If you ask my party or perhaps Celtavians, they will steamroll a single monster of APL+5 challenge rating. But I'm sure you can easily imagine another party that would find a monster at CR = APL to be exactly what the DMG assumes, that is an "average" encounter. </p><p></p><p>Rather than messing with the CR system, I think it's useful to stick with the same compatible "CR unit" used by the Monster Manual and the adventure supplements. </p><p></p><p>And instead accept that for a Demon Lord to be a serious threat to a minmaxed party of level 20 characters all by itself, it's CR should probably be 35 (using WotC's CR units).</p><p></p><p>You should probably keep the good work with your extended monster statistics table, where you roll back the way WotC made AC and other stats slow down as you approach CR 20. </p><p></p><p>But I honestly think you and us, your readers, would get the most usefulness out of your monsters if they stick to the only-lightly-tweaked WotC challenge ratings. </p><p></p><p>You could still keep ideas like the epic bonus. It's fair to see new curves appear at the start of the epic 21+ tier, just like PCs get revolutionary capstone abilities at level 20 (at least some classes do <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).</p><p></p><p>If you extrapolate the WotC CR progression up to CR 40, where would your Juiblex DPR fall on that scale. Let's guesstimate that kind of damage would mean CR 32.</p><p></p><p>So be it then, let's give him CR 32. </p><p></p><p>That number expresses, to me, that a level 20 party could take him, but only if they play at the top of their game. </p><p></p><p>Which probably is exactly what you want. </p><p></p><p>To the "average" WotC-assumed Dungeon Master, CR 32 says "instant death trap far far more dangerous than the CR 20 monsters we can handle", and that would be fine.</p><p></p><p>Everybody would keep speaking the same language. </p><p></p><p>Your CR 23 critters wouldn't have to be "strangely" much deadlier than the ones WotC publish, and the ones published on DMs Guild. </p><p></p><p>Because they wouldn't be CR 23. They would be CR 32. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6847567, member: 12731"] Good to hear, Dave. I honestly think the best way of thinking about it is the coldly analytical sober way: Q. What is a CR 25 creature to a Level 20 party? A. A creature five steps above their level. Nothing more, nothing less. Meaning that I'm thinking you want different... layers, tiers or what have you. A CR 25 Demon Lord is supposed to be more "epic" than a regular vanilla CR 25 monster. But I don't think that's the best way to look at it. All CR 25 critters are epic. That's why their CR is 21+. Whenever you want strong lieutenants for your epic Lords of Doom, use CR 11-20 critters. But resist the temptation to add in rank-and-file CR 21+ monsters. The game basically ends at or near level 20, and so anything above that CR should be unique or nearly unique. That means accepting that a CR 25 demon lord will be somewhat of a threat to a level 20 party. Not more, not less. How big a threat? That depends on the party optimization. If you ask my party or perhaps Celtavians, they will steamroll a single monster of APL+5 challenge rating. But I'm sure you can easily imagine another party that would find a monster at CR = APL to be exactly what the DMG assumes, that is an "average" encounter. Rather than messing with the CR system, I think it's useful to stick with the same compatible "CR unit" used by the Monster Manual and the adventure supplements. And instead accept that for a Demon Lord to be a serious threat to a minmaxed party of level 20 characters all by itself, it's CR should probably be 35 (using WotC's CR units). You should probably keep the good work with your extended monster statistics table, where you roll back the way WotC made AC and other stats slow down as you approach CR 20. But I honestly think you and us, your readers, would get the most usefulness out of your monsters if they stick to the only-lightly-tweaked WotC challenge ratings. You could still keep ideas like the epic bonus. It's fair to see new curves appear at the start of the epic 21+ tier, just like PCs get revolutionary capstone abilities at level 20 (at least some classes do ;) ). If you extrapolate the WotC CR progression up to CR 40, where would your Juiblex DPR fall on that scale. Let's guesstimate that kind of damage would mean CR 32. So be it then, let's give him CR 32. That number expresses, to me, that a level 20 party could take him, but only if they play at the top of their game. Which probably is exactly what you want. To the "average" WotC-assumed Dungeon Master, CR 32 says "instant death trap far far more dangerous than the CR 20 monsters we can handle", and that would be fine. Everybody would keep speaking the same language. Your CR 23 critters wouldn't have to be "strangely" much deadlier than the ones WotC publish, and the ones published on DMs Guild. Because they wouldn't be CR 23. They would be CR 32. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
JUIBLEX
Top