Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Just how compatible is Essentials?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5598584" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>In short by doing something that had <em>absolutely no in game effect on any PHB-based fighters</em> they almost miraculously allowed classes that fill what people desire who would otherwise be intimidated by 4e or lost in analysis paralysis. The change made was not substantive to any pre-existing characters; they barely even changed the name. The outcome was that entire new swathes of people had classes to suit them. Damn right this gets a fairytale ending - you don't normally have solutions that neat and that please just about everyone who tries them other than those completely hung up on a detail that makes absolutely no difference in actual play. What's in a name? You even still get to be a fighter. But so do people who think that fighters are something other than you think they are. Is your objection <em>really</em> that other people get toys almost as cool as yours? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Complete nonsense. Classic classes are still being supported - see Heroes of Shadow. New powers for warlocks, for wizards, for Paladins, and for Clerics - all PHB 1 classes. Essentials is just a part of 4e.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Google Translate gives that as "I control". Does anyone speak idiomatic internet German? Because the sound of Ich trolle is suspiciously close.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5598584, member: 87792"] In short by doing something that had [I]absolutely no in game effect on any PHB-based fighters[/I] they almost miraculously allowed classes that fill what people desire who would otherwise be intimidated by 4e or lost in analysis paralysis. The change made was not substantive to any pre-existing characters; they barely even changed the name. The outcome was that entire new swathes of people had classes to suit them. Damn right this gets a fairytale ending - you don't normally have solutions that neat and that please just about everyone who tries them other than those completely hung up on a detail that makes absolutely no difference in actual play. What's in a name? You even still get to be a fighter. But so do people who think that fighters are something other than you think they are. Is your objection [I]really[/I] that other people get toys almost as cool as yours? Complete nonsense. Classic classes are still being supported - see Heroes of Shadow. New powers for warlocks, for wizards, for Paladins, and for Clerics - all PHB 1 classes. Essentials is just a part of 4e. Google Translate gives that as "I control". Does anyone speak idiomatic internet German? Because the sound of Ich trolle is suspiciously close. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Just how compatible is Essentials?
Top