Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 5621032" data-attributes="member: 326">Howdy Deinos! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I thought it was a nifty idea myself. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> What makes you think any pantheon is static?What seems to be the case in Pantheons is that they'll outnumber these foes but individually be outmatched by them.Yes, that would be my understanding of it. These things are cosmically balanced and someone like Surtur is technically unvanquishable while the Norse Pantheon exists. he can be defeated/imprisoned for a time, but he'll always come back...like a bogeyman. Thats a long, long time though. Plus some apertures may get closed/destroyed before that.Tutelars would be more limited than deities in that they have to defend the apertures. So they are probably constrained by location.Tutelars may have opposed beings powered by the other end of the aperture.Good question. I'd have to think about it but my initial thoughts are that the Aperture would lose 90% of its potency.Always happy to help amigo.</blockquote>