Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7942200" data-attributes="member: 6779196">...What??? No. If you somehow managed to spend 600 rounds in combat, that would constitute “at least 1 hour of walking, fighting, casting spells, or similar adventuring activity.” As would spending 50 minutes casting rituals, 9 minutes walking, and 10 rounds of combat. As would spending an hour walking. As would spending 30 minutes foraging for food and 300 rounds of combat. If you spend a period of at least one hour doing any of the listed things, that interrupts the rest. If you spend a period of less than an hour doing any of the listed things, it doesn’t.Sure, hypothetically an hour of combat alone would be a case of spending “at least 1 hour of walking, fighting, casting spells, or similar adventuring activity.” I have no idea what either of us said that could possibly have given you the impression that we thought otherwise.Tolerable to whom? I told you, I’m not trying to interpret the rules to produce a particular outcome, I’m just assuming that the most natural interpretation of the text is the correct one.What problem??? You seem to be the only person who thinks the fact that 600 rounds of combat interrupts a short rest is a problem.I have a preference for favoring the most natural, intuitive reading of the text.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7942200, member: 6779196"] ...What??? No. If you somehow managed to spend 600 rounds in combat, that [I]would[/I] constitute “at least 1 hour of walking, fighting, casting spells, or similar adventuring activity.” As would spending 50 minutes casting rituals, 9 minutes walking, and 10 rounds of combat. As would spending an hour walking. As would spending 30 minutes foraging for food and 300 rounds of combat. If you spend a period of at least one hour doing any of the listed things, that interrupts the rest. If you spend a period of less than an hour doing any of the listed things, it doesn’t. Sure, hypothetically an hour of combat alone would be a case of spending “at least 1 hour of walking, fighting, casting spells, or similar adventuring activity.” I have no idea what either of us said that could possibly have given you the impression that we thought otherwise. Tolerable to whom? I told you, I’m not trying to interpret the rules to produce a particular outcome, I’m just assuming that the most natural interpretation of the text is the correct one. What problem??? You seem to be the only person who thinks the fact that 600 rounds of combat interrupts a short rest is a problem. I have a preference for favoring the most natural, intuitive reading of the text. [/QUOTE]

Verification