Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 7944828" data-attributes="member: 6787503">Ah, okay, I missed that. I think it might be worthwhile to write out a fully expanded form of each of our readings of the conditional because I feel like some nuances of meaning are lost in the parsings you’ve given above. As I stated up thread, I certainly don’t feel that your A captures my interpretation adequately, mainly because of your omission of the word “or”.First I’ll give a full rendering of my current understanding  of your interpretation as you have elucidated above:If the rest is interrupted by a period of at least 1 hour of walking, a period of fighting, a period of casting spells, or a period of similar adventuring activity, the characters must begin the rest again to gain any benefit from it.Now here’s my interpretation given the same treatment:If the rest is interrupted by at least 1 hour of walking, fighting, casting spells, or similar adventuring activity, the characters must begin the rest again to gain any benefit from it. I hope I’ve gotten your intended meaning correctly this time and helped to clarify any misconceptions you might have had about mine.</blockquote>