Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Horwath" data-source="post: 7888639" data-attributes="member: 6801299">I do agree that bloating of the content like 3/4E would be a very bad thing, but I do think that 5E is a little bit thin in mechanical sense. But I do think it's the best D&D edition for me.I do mind that all player choice mechanics is forced into the same resource pool. The ASI.I would rather see ASIs split into Combat feats, Non combat feats, ASIs and General1. All feats reworked to power level of current "half-feat".2. Now instead of default 5 ASIs, you get 3 Combat feats, 3 Non-combat feats, 3 times +1 to one ability, 3 times "general" that means any feat or +1 to ability.That could be spread out to:1st level: non-combat feat, combat feat2nd: +1 to ability.4th: general6th: non-combat feat8th: combat feat10th: +1 to ability.12th: general14th: non-combat feat16th: combat feat18th: +1 to ability.20th: generalNon-combat feats would be Racial feats, UA skill feats and underpowered PHB feats. Full feats would be split into 2 feats.Combat feats would be: Sharpshooter(half feat, removed -5/+10), Greatweapon master(removed -5/+10), Polearm master(split into 2 feats), Crossbow expert(removed Extra attack), Mobile(split into 2 feats)...maybe even limit max abilities to 18...</blockquote>