Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 8915429" data-attributes="member: 7023840">Gee, it's almost like you are trying to lecture me on something I have never read and never have experienced.Wait ... oh ... you mean I've actually written entire posts and threads on the subject? On this specific clause even????This should be interesting.See, here's the thing. You obviously don't understand what you just read. Here- allow me to show you.This what you wrote-&nbsp;If you would like to claim that it is not possible for Wizards, or some future management that holds this, to execute the &quot;declare the entire license void [...] in its entirety&quot;,This is the problem. You're ignoring the actual language that you just quoted. And, of course, the entire history of construing a severanace clause. This is the part that you didn't bold- If any part of this license is held to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason.So what does this mean? It means that you just transformed the word &quot;held&quot; to be &quot;held by Wizards,&quot; when that is not the actual meaning. The actual meaning of held in that clause is held by a court.So, yeah, the rest of the my comment stands. I find that this is to be disingenuous, and I find this type of misleading rhetoric to be harmful to actual discussion.Thanks!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 8915429, member: 7023840"] Gee, it's almost like you are trying to lecture me on something I have never read and never have experienced. Wait ... oh ... you mean I've actually written entire posts and threads on the subject? On this specific clause even???? This should be interesting. See, here's the thing. You obviously don't understand what you just read. Here- allow me to show you. This what you wrote- If you would like to claim that it is not possible for Wizards, [B]or some future management that holds this[/B], to execute the "declare the entire license void [...] in its entirety", This is the problem. You're ignoring the actual language that you just quoted. And, of course, the entire history of construing a severanace clause. This is the part that you didn't bold- [B] If any part of this license is held to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason.[/B] So what does this mean? It means that you just transformed the word "held" to be "held by Wizards," when that is not the actual meaning. The actual meaning of held in that clause is [I]held by a court[/I]. So, yeah, the rest of the my comment stands. I find that this is to be disingenuous, and I find this type of misleading rhetoric to be harmful to actual discussion. Thanks! [/QUOTE]

Verification