Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Just when I thought there might have been hope for the second D&D movie...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 1615213" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>Three words, different human being.</p><p></p><p>If you've got any evidence to present to suggest that the movie wasn't made for the fans, bring it up. Like I say, I'm happy to discuss either facts or opinions, but if you can't defend your opinion with a fact then don't expect me to take it for granted.</p><p></p><p>I'm not claiming definitively one way or the other, but there's at least one bit of evidence AGAINST your statement -- the word of the director himself, who claims to be a fan and made a movie he thought would be cool. Ergo, he made it for the fans.</p><p></p><p>Maybe not for YOU, but you do not represent all fans. Nobody does. So if he made it for SOME fans, your statement, "It was never made for the fans," is incorrect.</p><p></p><p>I'm not the slightest bit angry nor am I heated. I'm just smacking you for making insulting remarks. The statement "I prefer quality" has no meaning -- it only makes sense as an veiled insult towards those who disagree with you.</p><p></p><p>Because EVERYONE prefers quality, if that's the only variable on the table. EVERYONE will take the higher-quality item, all other things being equal.</p><p></p><p>The point isn't that you like quality and I like crap. It's that we disagree as to the definition of quality. And it's that very disagreement that is the interesting part of any conversation that you and I might have on this subject. It's that very disagreement that I would want to talk about. What does quality mean to you and why does one movie show it and not the other?</p><p></p><p>Here you go again. "Loyal D&D fans"? Come on. What you mean is, "People who agree (don't like the movie) with me agree with me (are loyal D&D fans)." And you're insinuating that people who like this film aren't loyal D&D fans, which is a ridiculous (and again, insulting) thing to say. Say this: "I don't like this movie." Isn't that simpler? Doesn't that feel better? Why do you need to support your opinion with these legions of mythical "Loyal D&D fans"?</p><p></p><p>I'm interested in YOUR opinion. I don't care HOW many people share it. But if all you've got for me is insults, well, we don't have anything to talk about, do we? And I think that's a shame.</p><p></p><p>I'm not objecting to anyone's critique of any movie. I'm objecting to you calling people who disagree with you stupid or disloyal or any other pejorative thing. And I'm not objecting to it because it makes me angry. Believe me, you're not capable of making me angry. Only IKEA furniture that won't assemble properly is truly capable of making me angry.</p><p></p><p>You think the standards of debate on ENWorld is a stupid topic? Well, it isn't to me, and I'm sorry that once again, the fact that I disagree with you is being taken by you as evidence of my stupidity.</p><p></p><p>But it isn't stupid to me; it's something I feel passionately about.</p><p></p><p>I WANT to hear your opinion. I think you're smart. I think you've probably got good ideas, and I want to know what they are, even if I disagree with them. But don't expect me to take insults, veiled, conscious, or otherwise, lying down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 1615213, member: 812"] Three words, different human being. If you've got any evidence to present to suggest that the movie wasn't made for the fans, bring it up. Like I say, I'm happy to discuss either facts or opinions, but if you can't defend your opinion with a fact then don't expect me to take it for granted. I'm not claiming definitively one way or the other, but there's at least one bit of evidence AGAINST your statement -- the word of the director himself, who claims to be a fan and made a movie he thought would be cool. Ergo, he made it for the fans. Maybe not for YOU, but you do not represent all fans. Nobody does. So if he made it for SOME fans, your statement, "It was never made for the fans," is incorrect. I'm not the slightest bit angry nor am I heated. I'm just smacking you for making insulting remarks. The statement "I prefer quality" has no meaning -- it only makes sense as an veiled insult towards those who disagree with you. Because EVERYONE prefers quality, if that's the only variable on the table. EVERYONE will take the higher-quality item, all other things being equal. The point isn't that you like quality and I like crap. It's that we disagree as to the definition of quality. And it's that very disagreement that is the interesting part of any conversation that you and I might have on this subject. It's that very disagreement that I would want to talk about. What does quality mean to you and why does one movie show it and not the other? Here you go again. "Loyal D&D fans"? Come on. What you mean is, "People who agree (don't like the movie) with me agree with me (are loyal D&D fans)." And you're insinuating that people who like this film aren't loyal D&D fans, which is a ridiculous (and again, insulting) thing to say. Say this: "I don't like this movie." Isn't that simpler? Doesn't that feel better? Why do you need to support your opinion with these legions of mythical "Loyal D&D fans"? I'm interested in YOUR opinion. I don't care HOW many people share it. But if all you've got for me is insults, well, we don't have anything to talk about, do we? And I think that's a shame. I'm not objecting to anyone's critique of any movie. I'm objecting to you calling people who disagree with you stupid or disloyal or any other pejorative thing. And I'm not objecting to it because it makes me angry. Believe me, you're not capable of making me angry. Only IKEA furniture that won't assemble properly is truly capable of making me angry. You think the standards of debate on ENWorld is a stupid topic? Well, it isn't to me, and I'm sorry that once again, the fact that I disagree with you is being taken by you as evidence of my stupidity. But it isn't stupid to me; it's something I feel passionately about. I WANT to hear your opinion. I think you're smart. I think you've probably got good ideas, and I want to know what they are, even if I disagree with them. But don't expect me to take insults, veiled, conscious, or otherwise, lying down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Just when I thought there might have been hope for the second D&D movie...
Top