Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Justification for favored classes... Is there any?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 742940" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>This is my take...</p><p></p><p>In the dark days of D&D, there were level limits. And they were bad. However, each race had a class it could gain the most levels in. In 2e (the one I know by heart), a races "favored" class was the one it could gain either 15th or Unlimited levels in. In 1e/2e, it was as such.</p><p></p><p>Dwarf: Fighter</p><p>Elf: Mage</p><p>Halfling: Thief</p><p>Gnome: Illusionist</p><p>Half-elf: Bard</p><p>Half-orc: Assassin (later, fighter)</p><p>Human: Any class (their "special benefit")</p><p></p><p>Also, if you looked at the Multi-class combinations, you'd note that these classes were the ones most commonly listed in multi-class combos. Of course, exceptions abounded. Half-elf couldn't mix bard with anything (until the Complete Bard's Handbook), but could mix almost all thier other classes together. Gnomes too, could mix any two of thier classes together. However, this coupled with the level limit debacle, ment you saw alot more dwarf fighters, elf mages (or fighter/mages), and halfling thieves than other combonations. </p><p></p><p>Flash foward to 3e. The favored class mechanic comes from this "racial preference" concept originally enforced with multi-classing combos and level limits. Since neither are going to exist, the designers, rathers than leave preference to the slaughter, enforced them in the form of favored classes. </p><p></p><p>dwarves, elves, halflings and gnomes all got their traditional classes (since 1e), humans got any, to represent the dual-classing rules, half-elves also got any, to represent the sheer number of multi-class combos they once had, and half-orcs got barbarian a.) because assassin was a PrC and fighter was already used b.) to highlight this new class and c.) further the archetype of the raging savage orc. </p><p></p><p>I personally see no problem with them. They keep PC's from wantonly picking out "kewl" levels, and I wave them when it is story appropriate (like the elf fighter 7 who became devout and began taking levels of paladin). It also seems to be one of the few things half-elves get over thier parent elves. It also enforces the traditional archetypes and racial norms without arbitarilty restricting them. Lastly, I've yet to hear anyone in my games complain about them (there is already enough whinning about item creation and PrCs, I don't think I could TAKE any on FC). </p><p></p><p>As a last thought, many "optional" races (like sub-races and monsters) have other classes as FC. Aasimar have paladin, wood-elves favor ranger, drow favor cleric, merfolk favor bard, etc. Their is even a race in If Thoughts Could Kill that has Psion as a FC. If its a giant hassle, rule-0 it, but I personally don't mind them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 742940, member: 7635"] This is my take... In the dark days of D&D, there were level limits. And they were bad. However, each race had a class it could gain the most levels in. In 2e (the one I know by heart), a races "favored" class was the one it could gain either 15th or Unlimited levels in. In 1e/2e, it was as such. Dwarf: Fighter Elf: Mage Halfling: Thief Gnome: Illusionist Half-elf: Bard Half-orc: Assassin (later, fighter) Human: Any class (their "special benefit") Also, if you looked at the Multi-class combinations, you'd note that these classes were the ones most commonly listed in multi-class combos. Of course, exceptions abounded. Half-elf couldn't mix bard with anything (until the Complete Bard's Handbook), but could mix almost all thier other classes together. Gnomes too, could mix any two of thier classes together. However, this coupled with the level limit debacle, ment you saw alot more dwarf fighters, elf mages (or fighter/mages), and halfling thieves than other combonations. Flash foward to 3e. The favored class mechanic comes from this "racial preference" concept originally enforced with multi-classing combos and level limits. Since neither are going to exist, the designers, rathers than leave preference to the slaughter, enforced them in the form of favored classes. dwarves, elves, halflings and gnomes all got their traditional classes (since 1e), humans got any, to represent the dual-classing rules, half-elves also got any, to represent the sheer number of multi-class combos they once had, and half-orcs got barbarian a.) because assassin was a PrC and fighter was already used b.) to highlight this new class and c.) further the archetype of the raging savage orc. I personally see no problem with them. They keep PC's from wantonly picking out "kewl" levels, and I wave them when it is story appropriate (like the elf fighter 7 who became devout and began taking levels of paladin). It also seems to be one of the few things half-elves get over thier parent elves. It also enforces the traditional archetypes and racial norms without arbitarilty restricting them. Lastly, I've yet to hear anyone in my games complain about them (there is already enough whinning about item creation and PrCs, I don't think I could TAKE any on FC). As a last thought, many "optional" races (like sub-races and monsters) have other classes as FC. Aasimar have paladin, wood-elves favor ranger, drow favor cleric, merfolk favor bard, etc. Their is even a race in If Thoughts Could Kill that has Psion as a FC. If its a giant hassle, rule-0 it, but I personally don't mind them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Justification for favored classes... Is there any?
Top