Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wolfshead" data-source="post: 171551" data-attributes="member: 1406">Used less by other companies, or used less by DMs and players?  Personally, I don't care how much of Kenzer's products are usable by other companies.  What matters is how much of it *I* will find usable.  I don't need any d20/OGC cross-pollination between publishers to decide what to include in my home campaign.  I pick and choose what I want, from whom I want.If I were a publisher, perhaps I might like to see some of this content available for my use.  Then again, what if I thought I could do it better?  I now have to make a choice.  Will I get more sales because of my product's versatility, since it is usable with the products of another company?  Or, will I get more sales because of the strength of my product's rules (assuming they *are* better than those previously published)?  I do like the fact that some publishers are taking advantage of the OGC concept and meshing their products with those of others.  However, I don't think this is the only way to conduct d20 business.Sorry to highjack the thread, but I've grown tired of hearing this complaint about Kenzer & Co.  I feel they should be judged on the strength of their products, not what license they're using.I will be purchasing the KoK Player's Guide, as soon as I have the cash (and as soon as my local gaming store gets it in- I'm still waiting for Geanavue).  Randy</blockquote>