Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Karmic Strike: Undefeatable.......?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hawken" data-source="post: 2197710" data-attributes="member: 23619"><p>Trip isn't <em>that</em> powerful a tactic, but it is very useful. As for difficulty, like anything else, it just requires a potent combination of effects to be more effective. A barbarian with 18 str, improved trip, a sweeping weapon, and in a rage (+4 str), gets +14 to his trip roll. That tips the odds high in his favor against many opponents. And while it may not work all the time, when it does, the Improved Trip feat lets you immediately make an attack at that BAB against a now prone target (AC -4). Also, unless the target has the prone fighting feat, they are -4 to making any attacks and their AC is still penalized for the AoO they draw if they try to rise. </p><p></p><p></p><p>No it's not argumentative at all. Its actually rather straightforward. Those Improved feats, as written in the PHB, specifically state that the attacker making those moves does not provoke an AoO for doing those actions. Karmic Strike may allow AoO for doing them normally, but if you have the Improved feats, then Karmic Strike doesn't work. Period. There is nothing in Karmic Strike that states it trumps Improved feats and the wording of the Improved feats explicitly negate the benefits of Karmic Strike. As for your line of reasoning being obvious, that is your interpretation and you're welcome to it, but my statement was based on the rules as written in both books. And going by the letter, and most likely the intention behind them, the Improved feats in question negate KS. There's no toss-up or anything in question. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Not any major errors, maybe a slip in use of automatic. But read PHB, pg 156, under the section "damage your opponent", in place of an attack, all you have to do is make a grapple check and you inflict your unarmed damage--or damage from the spikes if you're wearing spiked armor. So, in my example, with the pinned (immobile) opponent, you just need to make a grapple check (melee touch) against a target with no dex bonuses to AC, and you get your base unarmed damage + armor spikes + str + whatever. So, while automatic may have been a bad word, my point still stands that grappling (with Improved Grapple) is one of the quickest, easiest ways to overcome the KS feat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hawken, post: 2197710, member: 23619"] Trip isn't [i]that[/i] powerful a tactic, but it is very useful. As for difficulty, like anything else, it just requires a potent combination of effects to be more effective. A barbarian with 18 str, improved trip, a sweeping weapon, and in a rage (+4 str), gets +14 to his trip roll. That tips the odds high in his favor against many opponents. And while it may not work all the time, when it does, the Improved Trip feat lets you immediately make an attack at that BAB against a now prone target (AC -4). Also, unless the target has the prone fighting feat, they are -4 to making any attacks and their AC is still penalized for the AoO they draw if they try to rise. No it's not argumentative at all. Its actually rather straightforward. Those Improved feats, as written in the PHB, specifically state that the attacker making those moves does not provoke an AoO for doing those actions. Karmic Strike may allow AoO for doing them normally, but if you have the Improved feats, then Karmic Strike doesn't work. Period. There is nothing in Karmic Strike that states it trumps Improved feats and the wording of the Improved feats explicitly negate the benefits of Karmic Strike. As for your line of reasoning being obvious, that is your interpretation and you're welcome to it, but my statement was based on the rules as written in both books. And going by the letter, and most likely the intention behind them, the Improved feats in question negate KS. There's no toss-up or anything in question. Not any major errors, maybe a slip in use of automatic. But read PHB, pg 156, under the section "damage your opponent", in place of an attack, all you have to do is make a grapple check and you inflict your unarmed damage--or damage from the spikes if you're wearing spiked armor. So, in my example, with the pinned (immobile) opponent, you just need to make a grapple check (melee touch) against a target with no dex bonuses to AC, and you get your base unarmed damage + armor spikes + str + whatever. So, while automatic may have been a bad word, my point still stands that grappling (with Improved Grapple) is one of the quickest, easiest ways to overcome the KS feat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Karmic Strike: Undefeatable.......?
Top