Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sir Hawkeye" data-source="post: 486334" data-attributes="member: 295">To be contrarian, the answer is yes in each case. To create a simple +1 Flaming weapon, one of the required spells must be cast 8 times (once per day), so the spell is already &quot;stacking&quot; with itself in some way. Casting is 32 times for +1 flaming flaming burst weapon seems reasonable.An enchantment's prerequisites connect only loosely with the finished result, which typically bears little resemblance to the spells cast in creation. Both the Invulnerability and Fortification armor abilities can have Wish as pre-reqs, but the abilities themselves function completely separately. Which one is &quot;better&quot; and should override the other?At any rate, spells cast in the process of enchantment act in completely different ways than the normal versions of the spells.EDIT:I have to respectfully disagree with kreynolds on the stackability of flaming and flaming burst. Silly as it sounds, I would think damage would be exempt from the normal stacking rules.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sir Hawkeye, post: 486334, member: 295"] To be contrarian, the answer is yes in each case. To create a simple +1 Flaming weapon, one of the required spells must be cast [B]8 times[/B] (once per day), so the spell is already "stacking" with itself in some way. Casting is 32 times for +1 flaming flaming burst weapon seems reasonable. An enchantment's prerequisites connect only loosely with the finished result, which typically bears little resemblance to the spells cast in creation. Both the Invulnerability and Fortification armor abilities can have Wish as pre-reqs, but the abilities themselves function completely separately. Which one is "better" and should override the other? At any rate, spells cast in the process of enchantment act in completely different ways than the normal versions of the spells. EDIT: I have to respectfully disagree with kreynolds on the stackability of flaming and flaming burst. Silly as it sounds, I would think damage would be exempt from the normal stacking rules. [/QUOTE]

Verification