Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Keith Baker (creator of Eberron) Q & A thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hellcow" data-source="post: 1640614" data-attributes="member: 15800"><p>Well, first off, I have to agree with the other folks: Artificers are really going to want to pump up Use Magic Device. They don't have to put all their feats into it -- in one of my campaigns, the artificer went for Magical Aptitude and Point Blank Shot -- but there's a lot to be said for doing so. Just as a fighter is going to focus on combat feats and wizards will draw on metamagic feats, an Artificer should seriously look at Skill Focus and Magical Aptitude. </p><p></p><p>With that said, a focused artificer can get very good with UMD. At, say, 3rd level, any artificer could have the following:</p><p>6 ranks Use Magic Device</p><p>5 ranks Spellcraft</p><p>14 Charisma</p><p>Magical Aptitude</p><p>Skill Focus (UMD)</p><p>Creation Feats: Scribe Scroll, Brew Potion, Craft Wondrous Item</p><p>Artisan Bonus</p><p>This would provide a base +13 UMD, +15 if using wondrous items, +17 if using scrolls. </p><p>At this level, it would be odd for the character to be using scrolls of spells above 2nd level, which would put the DC at 23 -- not bad odds with a +17 modifier. </p><p></p><p>At the same time, you say that a wand could have a DC of up to 40. From my read of UMD, wands have a flat use DC of 20; the spell level is not a factor. *Scrolls* are an issue, and yes, a scroll with a caster level of 20 will have a DC of 40. But with a caster level of 20, this is some of the most powerful magic on the planet. And if the Artificer is a 20th-level artificer who's kept pace with his UMD, we're talking about a +34 UMD bonus, not counting any increase in Charisma, Charisma-enhancing items, skill enhancement, or cross-class Decipher Script. If he's kept his focus and is using items that match his level, he should be fine. If he's working outside his level, it will be more difficult. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, at 3rd level the artificer can't create a wand, so the idea that he should be able to use it because he can create it doesn't add up. 7th level is when he automatically gains the feat, and at that point he can have a total UMD modifier of +19 for Wands (assuming he hasn't increased Charisma)... which against a DC fixed at 20 is pretty good odds. Below that, yes, it's a challenge -- but even the 3rd level character with a +13 UMD has a better that 50% chance of getting a wand to work. </p><p></p><p></p><p>One could argue that the rogue should have a greater edge over the artificer when it comes to disabling devices or picking locks. Both have the potential to do either task -- use a magic item or pick a lock. The question is, which are you going to focus on? If the rogue dedicates his character idea to being able to use magic items, buys the feats, invests the skill points -- I'm happy to let him almost match the artificer (since the artificer will *still* have the edge from his Artisan bonus). Likewise, the artificer *could* match the rogue's lockpicking skills if that's where he puts his points -- but that will keep him from investing them in crafting abilities. There's the potential of the character, and then there's the logical point spread; my guess is that the typical artificer will be much better with UMD than the typical rogue, but that's a choice he makes. </p><p></p><p>The other thing to remember is that UMD is a cross-class skill for almost every class. The fact that it's already a class skill for the artificer is a huge advantage in this field. </p><p></p><p>In a sense, the artificer is like an auto mechanic, while the rogue with UMD is a car thief. Both know how to hotwire cars if they have to -- the artificer because he knows how they're designed, the rogue because he's learned the tricks of his trade. But any time the artificer wants to use a car without the keys, he still has to hotwire it, and that's still a chore; he can't just slap the car on the hood and make it start. The artificer's specialty is <em>making</em> magic items, and that gives him access to the ability to use them -- it doesn't automatically allow him to do it. </p><p></p><p>I'll also note that UMD is extremely important for spell storing item -- so the feats are definitely a worthwhile investment, whether you get them right away or later in life.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hellcow, post: 1640614, member: 15800"] Well, first off, I have to agree with the other folks: Artificers are really going to want to pump up Use Magic Device. They don't have to put all their feats into it -- in one of my campaigns, the artificer went for Magical Aptitude and Point Blank Shot -- but there's a lot to be said for doing so. Just as a fighter is going to focus on combat feats and wizards will draw on metamagic feats, an Artificer should seriously look at Skill Focus and Magical Aptitude. With that said, a focused artificer can get very good with UMD. At, say, 3rd level, any artificer could have the following: 6 ranks Use Magic Device 5 ranks Spellcraft 14 Charisma Magical Aptitude Skill Focus (UMD) Creation Feats: Scribe Scroll, Brew Potion, Craft Wondrous Item Artisan Bonus This would provide a base +13 UMD, +15 if using wondrous items, +17 if using scrolls. At this level, it would be odd for the character to be using scrolls of spells above 2nd level, which would put the DC at 23 -- not bad odds with a +17 modifier. At the same time, you say that a wand could have a DC of up to 40. From my read of UMD, wands have a flat use DC of 20; the spell level is not a factor. *Scrolls* are an issue, and yes, a scroll with a caster level of 20 will have a DC of 40. But with a caster level of 20, this is some of the most powerful magic on the planet. And if the Artificer is a 20th-level artificer who's kept pace with his UMD, we're talking about a +34 UMD bonus, not counting any increase in Charisma, Charisma-enhancing items, skill enhancement, or cross-class Decipher Script. If he's kept his focus and is using items that match his level, he should be fine. If he's working outside his level, it will be more difficult. Well, at 3rd level the artificer can't create a wand, so the idea that he should be able to use it because he can create it doesn't add up. 7th level is when he automatically gains the feat, and at that point he can have a total UMD modifier of +19 for Wands (assuming he hasn't increased Charisma)... which against a DC fixed at 20 is pretty good odds. Below that, yes, it's a challenge -- but even the 3rd level character with a +13 UMD has a better that 50% chance of getting a wand to work. One could argue that the rogue should have a greater edge over the artificer when it comes to disabling devices or picking locks. Both have the potential to do either task -- use a magic item or pick a lock. The question is, which are you going to focus on? If the rogue dedicates his character idea to being able to use magic items, buys the feats, invests the skill points -- I'm happy to let him almost match the artificer (since the artificer will *still* have the edge from his Artisan bonus). Likewise, the artificer *could* match the rogue's lockpicking skills if that's where he puts his points -- but that will keep him from investing them in crafting abilities. There's the potential of the character, and then there's the logical point spread; my guess is that the typical artificer will be much better with UMD than the typical rogue, but that's a choice he makes. The other thing to remember is that UMD is a cross-class skill for almost every class. The fact that it's already a class skill for the artificer is a huge advantage in this field. In a sense, the artificer is like an auto mechanic, while the rogue with UMD is a car thief. Both know how to hotwire cars if they have to -- the artificer because he knows how they're designed, the rogue because he's learned the tricks of his trade. But any time the artificer wants to use a car without the keys, he still has to hotwire it, and that's still a chore; he can't just slap the car on the hood and make it start. The artificer's specialty is [i]making[/i] magic items, and that gives him access to the ability to use them -- it doesn't automatically allow him to do it. I'll also note that UMD is extremely important for spell storing item -- so the feats are definitely a worthwhile investment, whether you get them right away or later in life. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Keith Baker (creator of Eberron) Q & A thread
Top