Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Kender are a core race?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6188577" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>There's two things about this short sentence I don't understand.</p><p></p><p>The first is that I don't understand how "circumstances" could "force" you into playing a game you don't want to play. If someone wants to play something, and you don't want them to play it, you can <em>ask them not to play it</em>, no? And, assuming that their fun doesn't hinge on one particular character choice, you're good. And if it DOES hinge on that one particular character choice, well, you'd never be able to play together happily anyway, because your styles are incompatible, so <em>there's no big loss</em>. Congrats, you avoided playing a game with someone you wouldn't have enjoyed playing the game with. It's win/win, and all you had to do was ask them if they could maybe not play a character that's incompatible with your preferred style. No one is forced to do anything, you have a talk about what you want, and if you want different things, you go your separate ways -- better to not play than to play something you're not having fun with!</p><p></p><p>The second is that I don't understand why someone who had such a high bar for the experience would go do something like participate in an event where they are not in control of what the experience is. If your D&D is defined quite rigidly by you, and that is all you like playing, why would you go somewhere that you <em>know</em> you wouldn't like to play it -- ie, somewhere where the definition isn't yours? That's just signing you and all of your players up to be disappointed, if you disagree with the framing of the scenario. If that's "all you can get," why would you get ANY, if it didn't meet your high standards?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I wouldn't say it's arrogant to discuss some expectations. "There are only elves and dwarves and halflings and humans because this is a standard pseudo-medieval Tolkeinequery" is totally fair, because that defines a kind of feel you're going for, and reveals some of what to expect.</p><p></p><p>I would say it's kind of silly to be too inflexible, because then you wind up in a position where the only thing you want to play isn't something that anyone else is really interested in playing, but like I said above, that's kind of a problem that solves itself. If all you like to play isn't what anyone around you wants to play than no one plays with you, and so no one needs to suffer under the oppressive preferences of the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 6188577, member: 2067"] There's two things about this short sentence I don't understand. The first is that I don't understand how "circumstances" could "force" you into playing a game you don't want to play. If someone wants to play something, and you don't want them to play it, you can [I]ask them not to play it[/I], no? And, assuming that their fun doesn't hinge on one particular character choice, you're good. And if it DOES hinge on that one particular character choice, well, you'd never be able to play together happily anyway, because your styles are incompatible, so [I]there's no big loss[/I]. Congrats, you avoided playing a game with someone you wouldn't have enjoyed playing the game with. It's win/win, and all you had to do was ask them if they could maybe not play a character that's incompatible with your preferred style. No one is forced to do anything, you have a talk about what you want, and if you want different things, you go your separate ways -- better to not play than to play something you're not having fun with! The second is that I don't understand why someone who had such a high bar for the experience would go do something like participate in an event where they are not in control of what the experience is. If your D&D is defined quite rigidly by you, and that is all you like playing, why would you go somewhere that you [I]know[/I] you wouldn't like to play it -- ie, somewhere where the definition isn't yours? That's just signing you and all of your players up to be disappointed, if you disagree with the framing of the scenario. If that's "all you can get," why would you get ANY, if it didn't meet your high standards? I wouldn't say it's arrogant to discuss some expectations. "There are only elves and dwarves and halflings and humans because this is a standard pseudo-medieval Tolkeinequery" is totally fair, because that defines a kind of feel you're going for, and reveals some of what to expect. I would say it's kind of silly to be too inflexible, because then you wind up in a position where the only thing you want to play isn't something that anyone else is really interested in playing, but like I said above, that's kind of a problem that solves itself. If all you like to play isn't what anyone around you wants to play than no one plays with you, and so no one needs to suffer under the oppressive preferences of the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Kender are a core race?
Top