Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Piperken" data-source="post: 9692994" data-attributes="member: 7047091">As a reader, I really appreciate thoughtfulness when someone takes what is dense and attempts through the choices they make in representing that information, to make it easier to parse for most readers (e.g. relationships/faction map, large maps broken up into smaller maps, a chapter on factions, their motivations, key figures, their lairs, how they could respond to something, random tables with intersections at their heart, etc).Everyone will have their preferences ofc on what visually appeals and is effective or digestible, so ymmv, but I genuinely appreciate the attempt and consider the models the writer(s) outline.Something like a mega dungeon or a campaign book would need to employ a variety of different tools or styles to get there I'd imagine; its format would have to be bespoke for each project. I couldn't imagine for example, writing an entire mega dungeon in rote bullet points, it'd get boring for me, and hard to look at! :3</blockquote>