Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
"Kill Bill" to pull a Matrix Sequel Split
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Green Knight" data-source="post: 1011614" data-attributes="member: 2723"><p>I'm just surprised they're willing to negotiate new contracts with the actors, who signed on for one movie and are getting paid for one, but now it turns out they've actually made two movies. That's certainly more than what the cast of the 1973 version of<strong> The Three Musketeers</strong>, which included Charlton Heston, Oliver Reed, Christopher Lee, Faye Dunaway, Raquel Welch, and Michael York, got (FYI,<strong> The Three Musketeers</strong> was originally supposed to be one movie, to. But the producers decided to split it into two movies,<strong> The Three Musketeers</strong> and<strong> The Four Musketeers</strong>. So the cast ended up making two movies, but only ended up getting paid for one). </p><p> </p><p>Personally I don't care either way, as I'm not even sure I care enough to see this movie.<strong> From Dusk Til Dawn</strong> pretty much killed any interest in Quentin Tarentinos' movies I might have. </p><p> </p><p>But as far as splitting it goes, I gotta disagree with the first poster. This isn't a sign of Miramax losing faith in Tarentino. Rather, this is a sign of complete faith in him. He came to them with this idea with the stipulation that he get to make it at its original length. And guess what, they agreed! They didn't make him cut it down. And now they're splitting it into two movies. They probably figured it'd be to long for one showing, BUT they didn't ask Tarentino to cut it short. Instead, they're still releasing the whole thing. It isn't lack of faith that leads one to want to spend money on TWO WHOLLY SEPARATE ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. If they had no faith or wanted it shorter, then they could've told him to cut it short, but instead, they let him keep it all, and are willing to promote not one but TWO movies. That, to me at least, is a sign of EXTREME faith. Hell, I may have to go see it just because of that. If someone's willing to splurge that much money on one of Quentin Tarentino's movies, then odds are that it's a pretty damned good movie, like<strong> Pulp Fiction</strong>, and not a piece of dreck, like<strong> From Dusk Til Dawn</strong> (Which, in all honesty, WAS a good movie. At least til the moment the vampires showed up. You can pinpoint, TO THE SECOND, the moment that movie started to suck, which was the instant that the first supernatural element in the movie, appeared).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Green Knight, post: 1011614, member: 2723"] I'm just surprised they're willing to negotiate new contracts with the actors, who signed on for one movie and are getting paid for one, but now it turns out they've actually made two movies. That's certainly more than what the cast of the 1973 version of[b] The Three Musketeers[/b], which included Charlton Heston, Oliver Reed, Christopher Lee, Faye Dunaway, Raquel Welch, and Michael York, got (FYI,[b] The Three Musketeers[/b] was originally supposed to be one movie, to. But the producers decided to split it into two movies,[b] The Three Musketeers[/b] and[b] The Four Musketeers[/b]. So the cast ended up making two movies, but only ended up getting paid for one). Personally I don't care either way, as I'm not even sure I care enough to see this movie.[b] From Dusk Til Dawn[/b] pretty much killed any interest in Quentin Tarentinos' movies I might have. But as far as splitting it goes, I gotta disagree with the first poster. This isn't a sign of Miramax losing faith in Tarentino. Rather, this is a sign of complete faith in him. He came to them with this idea with the stipulation that he get to make it at its original length. And guess what, they agreed! They didn't make him cut it down. And now they're splitting it into two movies. They probably figured it'd be to long for one showing, BUT they didn't ask Tarentino to cut it short. Instead, they're still releasing the whole thing. It isn't lack of faith that leads one to want to spend money on TWO WHOLLY SEPARATE ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. If they had no faith or wanted it shorter, then they could've told him to cut it short, but instead, they let him keep it all, and are willing to promote not one but TWO movies. That, to me at least, is a sign of EXTREME faith. Hell, I may have to go see it just because of that. If someone's willing to splurge that much money on one of Quentin Tarentino's movies, then odds are that it's a pretty damned good movie, like[b] Pulp Fiction[/b], and not a piece of dreck, like[b] From Dusk Til Dawn[/b] (Which, in all honesty, WAS a good movie. At least til the moment the vampires showed up. You can pinpoint, TO THE SECOND, the moment that movie started to suck, which was the instant that the first supernatural element in the movie, appeared). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
"Kill Bill" to pull a Matrix Sequel Split
Top