Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"'Kill it before it grows'...he said 'Kill it before it grows'..."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5781702" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>I dunno, that sounds a little cynical to me. I think that people who value "flavor" and "verisimiltude" generally believe that player satisfaction comes from these things first, that without these things, there isn't as much player satisfaction. Thus, rules that, in their view, damage these things, don't accomplish the goal of making everyone at the table happy -- a limitation on player options for the goal of flavor or verisimilitude makes the game better for everyone, even if it's a small limitation in the rules. </p><p></p><p>And there may be plenty of players who are satisfied with that explanation, or who, at least, don't mind indulging the DM in that way. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I really don't think the raw hatred of other people having fun is quite as strong as you seem to believe. People can be crazy divisive, but I think a lot of that springs from the idea that there is One Best Way To Play and everyone who isn't playing that way is Doing It Wrong. 5e seems to be abandoning the idea that there is only one way to do things, and embracing the idea that people have fun in different ways, some of them mutually exclusive.</p><p></p><p>I guess I'm not quite convinced that most of the people who play or DM D&D just want to be jerks. My own experience is that most of the people who play or DM D&D really want to have fun with their friends while pretending to be magical gumdrop elves (or whatever). It might be anomalous, but it at least is a datapoint in favor of the idea that an inclusive game isn't automatically going to be loathed by a hate-fueled base. As long as the game is inclusive, and doesn't tell you The Only Way To Play (tm), I don't see it having a major problem.</p><p></p><p>And I guess those few that DO have a problem with it...those people who can't stand the idea that my fun with the game might be different from their fun with the game...I'm pretty happy to loose those people as D&D fans. I'm really not eager to keep around folks who think that because I don't like minis combat (or whatever), I shouldn't be allowed to play Official D&D. I honestly think those people are in a minority.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5781702, member: 2067"] I dunno, that sounds a little cynical to me. I think that people who value "flavor" and "verisimiltude" generally believe that player satisfaction comes from these things first, that without these things, there isn't as much player satisfaction. Thus, rules that, in their view, damage these things, don't accomplish the goal of making everyone at the table happy -- a limitation on player options for the goal of flavor or verisimilitude makes the game better for everyone, even if it's a small limitation in the rules. And there may be plenty of players who are satisfied with that explanation, or who, at least, don't mind indulging the DM in that way. I really don't think the raw hatred of other people having fun is quite as strong as you seem to believe. People can be crazy divisive, but I think a lot of that springs from the idea that there is One Best Way To Play and everyone who isn't playing that way is Doing It Wrong. 5e seems to be abandoning the idea that there is only one way to do things, and embracing the idea that people have fun in different ways, some of them mutually exclusive. I guess I'm not quite convinced that most of the people who play or DM D&D just want to be jerks. My own experience is that most of the people who play or DM D&D really want to have fun with their friends while pretending to be magical gumdrop elves (or whatever). It might be anomalous, but it at least is a datapoint in favor of the idea that an inclusive game isn't automatically going to be loathed by a hate-fueled base. As long as the game is inclusive, and doesn't tell you The Only Way To Play (tm), I don't see it having a major problem. And I guess those few that DO have a problem with it...those people who can't stand the idea that my fun with the game might be different from their fun with the game...I'm pretty happy to loose those people as D&D fans. I'm really not eager to keep around folks who think that because I don't like minis combat (or whatever), I shouldn't be allowed to play Official D&D. I honestly think those people are in a minority. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"'Kill it before it grows'...he said 'Kill it before it grows'..."
Top