Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 6795852" data-attributes="member: 23751">Yes they were.  If the group doesn't metagame, then there's no point in discussing things the group doesn't know.  If they do metagame, then the PCs know everything that the players know.  That they were discussing it means that the party was aware of it one way or another.One lone good drow survived it for years all by himself.  If you're making it more than it is, that's on you.  It's more dangerous than the surface, but not by so much that the group couldn't easily survive with a comatose companion.Eh, no.  I just understand that the group is fully capable of survival with my PC's comatose body there.  There is a large probability that the group will not TPK because of the PC's presence, and if they do beat the odds and come across a foe so dangerous that the comatose PC is going to get them killed, then and ONLY then are they justified in leaving the PC to die.  Murdering the PC because they might, maybe, possible come across such a foe is a murder of expedience and evil.Then she's and you are evil.  If she and you weren't, you'd take him with you and only leave him behind if you actually encountered cultists, and maybe not even then depending on circumstances.Sophistry.  The odds are not much worse with the PC than without.  If they are even worse at all given that you can abandon that PC at any time.</blockquote>