Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Kinda changing rules without telling players.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 816874" data-attributes="member: 7701"><p>I agree with what you're saying here. However, this isn't the same thing as DocM's situation, I'm afraid.</p><p></p><p>You wouldn't create the item if the DM told you how much to spend and how much XP to mark off if it was too high, correct? You would change your mind and come up with something else to make or do, ie. change your tactics based on the situation. (Now, there would certainly be reaon to get upset if the DM said - no, you can't roll Knowledge (arcana) to research the cost of the items you're going to make, and you are stuck with it. But DocM let the players roll to discover what was going on. And, IIRC from one of his much earlier posts, some characters *did* have silver weapons...]</p><p></p><p>That seems to be what DocM is allowing. He let them see the results of their actions, and then give them checks to change their minds and come up with something else to deal with the situation, ie. change their tactics.</p><p></p><p>I still fail to see the problem, other than different play styles. Simply put, some players would not tolerate things being changed on them, in any way, shape, or form. Others are fine with changes in DM books, while others accept wholesale changes to the rules, even the PHB.</p><p></p><p>Whether you're changing DR or just modifying lycanthropes, <em>the results are the same</em>. A player (with only a 2nd level character, remember) can only get mad if he/she is metagaming the situation. He can't possibly know that the lycanthropes have been "modified" or that DR has changed, therefore he metagamed. For DocM's group - metagaming is bad. Problem is with the player, not DocM.</p><p></p><p>The entire "changing of DR" issue can be solved in-game, and an announcement is hardly necessary. After this encounter, the PCs can go and research with a sage about creatures that have some form of weapon immunities, and what different substances there are that hurt creatures, and be suitably prepared in the future. That is all, IMO, players need to know about DR, or even the existance of DR. Not in PHB = players don't need to know to run their characters effectively. [This is a individual group thing, of course, but is a *perfectly* valid way of playing. Some players may not like it, and they'll have to decide whether they can play in such an environment.]</p><p></p><p>Theoretically, though, what DocM did was absolutely fine. Now the players (or in this case, *one* player in his group) must decide whether he can live with that. Welcome to gaming in a group environment, folks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arnwyn, post: 816874, member: 7701"] I agree with what you're saying here. However, this isn't the same thing as DocM's situation, I'm afraid. You wouldn't create the item if the DM told you how much to spend and how much XP to mark off if it was too high, correct? You would change your mind and come up with something else to make or do, ie. change your tactics based on the situation. (Now, there would certainly be reaon to get upset if the DM said - no, you can't roll Knowledge (arcana) to research the cost of the items you're going to make, and you are stuck with it. But DocM let the players roll to discover what was going on. And, IIRC from one of his much earlier posts, some characters *did* have silver weapons...] That seems to be what DocM is allowing. He let them see the results of their actions, and then give them checks to change their minds and come up with something else to deal with the situation, ie. change their tactics. I still fail to see the problem, other than different play styles. Simply put, some players would not tolerate things being changed on them, in any way, shape, or form. Others are fine with changes in DM books, while others accept wholesale changes to the rules, even the PHB. Whether you're changing DR or just modifying lycanthropes, [i]the results are the same[/i]. A player (with only a 2nd level character, remember) can only get mad if he/she is metagaming the situation. He can't possibly know that the lycanthropes have been "modified" or that DR has changed, therefore he metagamed. For DocM's group - metagaming is bad. Problem is with the player, not DocM. The entire "changing of DR" issue can be solved in-game, and an announcement is hardly necessary. After this encounter, the PCs can go and research with a sage about creatures that have some form of weapon immunities, and what different substances there are that hurt creatures, and be suitably prepared in the future. That is all, IMO, players need to know about DR, or even the existance of DR. Not in PHB = players don't need to know to run their characters effectively. [This is a individual group thing, of course, but is a *perfectly* valid way of playing. Some players may not like it, and they'll have to decide whether they can play in such an environment.] Theoretically, though, what DocM did was absolutely fine. Now the players (or in this case, *one* player in his group) must decide whether he can live with that. Welcome to gaming in a group environment, folks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Kinda changing rules without telling players.
Top