Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
King Conan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chain Lightning" data-source="post: 495242" data-attributes="member: 6791"><p>Mark wrote: </p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's cool. I too enjoy the cheezy fantasies as much as some of the serious ones too. But I enjoy them for different reasons. Both serve to entertain two separate tastes. If Conan became cheezy....it would not entertain either for me. And its because Conan is not suppose to be cheezy fantasy.</p><p></p><p>Sure I like cheezy fantasy....when its suppose to be and when its done well. [ "Army of Darkness", "Princess Bride"]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Or do you mean cheezy as in 'B-Movie' cheezy? In that case....I don't mind those either....as long as they do it in their yard and not in a huge property like Conan. Its okay for "Beastmaster" to be cheezy because it is it's own property. It didn't 'turn' cheezy froma previously established serious material. It didnt' mess up a property. Turning Conan cheezy would mess it up.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Mark wrote: </p><p></p><p>Mark, you're an optimist aren't you? Either that, or you're naive as to the amount of wisdom that exists in Hollywood. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>But let's hope you're right.</p><p></p><p>Mark wrote: </p><p></p><p>I disagree. What happens when you let someone try and fail is you get a property/film franchise that dies and no one (as in the funders with money) wants to resurrect it when someone good finally does come along to 're-do' it better.</p><p></p><p>No one is going to re-do a good 'Street Fighter' movie because Steven DeSouza already messed up. Same with 'Resident Evil'. Look how dead in the water the 'Alien' franchise is. </p><p></p><p>Proper resurrection of a film franchise is possible, but it usually involves a long wait for audiences to 'forget' the last horrible one. So if we went with you sentiment Mark, we'd see a terrible Conan movie that fails around 2004 (you'd get your quick fantasy fix) and then no one will touch the property for 10 years. Because that's how long it will take other directors and producers to convince some studio exec that they can do it right 'this time'.</p><p></p><p>jdavis wrote: </p><p></p><p>Because most of those in Hollywood with the power over your beloved property lack common sense. In other words.....they're stupid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chain Lightning, post: 495242, member: 6791"] Mark wrote: And that's cool. I too enjoy the cheezy fantasies as much as some of the serious ones too. But I enjoy them for different reasons. Both serve to entertain two separate tastes. If Conan became cheezy....it would not entertain either for me. And its because Conan is not suppose to be cheezy fantasy. Sure I like cheezy fantasy....when its suppose to be and when its done well. [ "Army of Darkness", "Princess Bride"] Or do you mean cheezy as in 'B-Movie' cheezy? In that case....I don't mind those either....as long as they do it in their yard and not in a huge property like Conan. Its okay for "Beastmaster" to be cheezy because it is it's own property. It didn't 'turn' cheezy froma previously established serious material. It didnt' mess up a property. Turning Conan cheezy would mess it up. Mark wrote: Mark, you're an optimist aren't you? Either that, or you're naive as to the amount of wisdom that exists in Hollywood. :D But let's hope you're right. Mark wrote: I disagree. What happens when you let someone try and fail is you get a property/film franchise that dies and no one (as in the funders with money) wants to resurrect it when someone good finally does come along to 're-do' it better. No one is going to re-do a good 'Street Fighter' movie because Steven DeSouza already messed up. Same with 'Resident Evil'. Look how dead in the water the 'Alien' franchise is. Proper resurrection of a film franchise is possible, but it usually involves a long wait for audiences to 'forget' the last horrible one. So if we went with you sentiment Mark, we'd see a terrible Conan movie that fails around 2004 (you'd get your quick fantasy fix) and then no one will touch the property for 10 years. Because that's how long it will take other directors and producers to convince some studio exec that they can do it right 'this time'. jdavis wrote: Because most of those in Hollywood with the power over your beloved property lack common sense. In other words.....they're stupid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
King Conan
Top