Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Kir-Lanan ECL...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 507597" data-attributes="member: 6875"><p>Depending, of course, on armor choices -- and IIRC, the Kir Lanaan do not wear traditional PHB-style armor; they have their own, racial armor which is the equivalent of Leather, only. As a flying creature, I fail to see how most forms of Heavy-class armor would permit continued flight, while being worn. Even Mithril Full Plate would be too restrictive, or, would have to leave large swaths of the Kir-Lanan uncovered (the wings, and areas around the wing-shoulders ...).</p><p></p><p>Also, your count of feats is slightly off. A human Fighter-8 should have 8 feats (racial; character levels 1, 3, and 6; fighter levels 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8); the Kir-Lanan will have 4 feats (racial/monster levels; character level 1; fighter levels 1 and 2). That's a gap one wider than you listed. Also note, the Fighter's higher BAB qualifies him (IIRC) for Improved Critical, not to mention having enough fighter levels for Weapon Specialisation. That's a bit of further advantage to the human fighter, IMO.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You won't find <strong>me</strong> arguing that this isn't a BIG advantage -- IMO, aside form the coolness factor of the Kir-Lanan concept, it's the main <strong>mechanics</strong> reason to play a Kir-Lanan! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it should be reasonable to impose the same limits in terms of armor and encumbrance on ANY creature that flies through means other than pure magic, as are imposed on flying <strong>steeds</strong>. So to retain that flight, the Kir-Lanan has to accept a more restricted choice of armor. Also, the Kir-Lanan is not gettign the +1 skill point / level of the human fighter (of course); I don't think we should overlook ANY differences, do you?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>By only 2 points (Human Fighter base saves add to 24, Kir-Lanan Fighter base saves add to 26). Less significant at higher levels than at lower levels.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But behind in terms of actual skill points, I believe.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Um. Human Fighter(20) ... try <strong>20</strong> feats (racial; character levels 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18; fighter levels 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20). Well more than 12.</p><p></p><p>Kir-Lanan Fighter(14), that's <strong>14</strong> feats (race/monster level, character levels 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12; fighter levels 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14).</p><p></p><p>The gap has widened to 6 ....</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Given we're talking about an FRCS race, I feel quite confident in pointing out that the fighter can catch up -- and then some -- for well less than 40,000gp. There are several methods to get flight -- usable at will -- other than Wings of Flying. The Winged Mask, IIRC, from <em>Magic of Faerun</em>, is significantly cheaper (for the minor drawback of highlighting your presence whenever you fly).</p><p></p><p>Also, the ffighter can gain +3 natural AC, as you noted, from the Amulet. For the Kir-Lanan to get the same +3 armor <strong>beyond</strong> their base state, costs SIGNIFICANTLY more than it cost the fighter (as they would need to get an EPIC Amulet of Natural Armor +6 ... !!).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>15 hit points and <strong>six</strong> feats. Loss of natural armor edge for (in the eyes of a human Fighter-20) is a PITTANCE in monetary terms; logically, the inability to wear heavy armor at ALL (resulting in a LOWER net AC for the Kir-Lanan), if flight is desired.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No; two more levels would, at 20th ECL, give the Kir-Lanan only 2 more feats (Character-15 and Fighter-16), narrowing the gap from 6 feats to 4 feats. You really need to learn to count feats better ... no offense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pax, post: 507597, member: 6875"] Depending, of course, on armor choices -- and IIRC, the Kir Lanaan do not wear traditional PHB-style armor; they have their own, racial armor which is the equivalent of Leather, only. As a flying creature, I fail to see how most forms of Heavy-class armor would permit continued flight, while being worn. Even Mithril Full Plate would be too restrictive, or, would have to leave large swaths of the Kir-Lanan uncovered (the wings, and areas around the wing-shoulders ...). Also, your count of feats is slightly off. A human Fighter-8 should have 8 feats (racial; character levels 1, 3, and 6; fighter levels 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8); the Kir-Lanan will have 4 feats (racial/monster levels; character level 1; fighter levels 1 and 2). That's a gap one wider than you listed. Also note, the Fighter's higher BAB qualifies him (IIRC) for Improved Critical, not to mention having enough fighter levels for Weapon Specialisation. That's a bit of further advantage to the human fighter, IMO. You won't find [b]me[/b] arguing that this isn't a BIG advantage -- IMO, aside form the coolness factor of the Kir-Lanan concept, it's the main [b]mechanics[/b] reason to play a Kir-Lanan! :) I think it should be reasonable to impose the same limits in terms of armor and encumbrance on ANY creature that flies through means other than pure magic, as are imposed on flying [b]steeds[/b]. So to retain that flight, the Kir-Lanan has to accept a more restricted choice of armor. Also, the Kir-Lanan is not gettign the +1 skill point / level of the human fighter (of course); I don't think we should overlook ANY differences, do you? By only 2 points (Human Fighter base saves add to 24, Kir-Lanan Fighter base saves add to 26). Less significant at higher levels than at lower levels. But behind in terms of actual skill points, I believe. Um. Human Fighter(20) ... try [b]20[/b] feats (racial; character levels 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18; fighter levels 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20). Well more than 12. Kir-Lanan Fighter(14), that's [b]14[/b] feats (race/monster level, character levels 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12; fighter levels 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14). The gap has widened to 6 .... Given we're talking about an FRCS race, I feel quite confident in pointing out that the fighter can catch up -- and then some -- for well less than 40,000gp. There are several methods to get flight -- usable at will -- other than Wings of Flying. The Winged Mask, IIRC, from [i]Magic of Faerun[/i], is significantly cheaper (for the minor drawback of highlighting your presence whenever you fly). Also, the ffighter can gain +3 natural AC, as you noted, from the Amulet. For the Kir-Lanan to get the same +3 armor [b]beyond[/b] their base state, costs SIGNIFICANTLY more than it cost the fighter (as they would need to get an EPIC Amulet of Natural Armor +6 ... !!). 15 hit points and [b]six[/b] feats. Loss of natural armor edge for (in the eyes of a human Fighter-20) is a PITTANCE in monetary terms; logically, the inability to wear heavy armor at ALL (resulting in a LOWER net AC for the Kir-Lanan), if flight is desired. No; two more levels would, at 20th ECL, give the Kir-Lanan only 2 more feats (Character-15 and Fighter-16), narrowing the gap from 6 feats to 4 feats. You really need to learn to count feats better ... no offense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Kir-Lanan ECL...
Top