Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 3320112" data-attributes="member: 35788">Okay, I realize that I am the one who started this debate and I suppose I should be the one to finish it.&nbsp; So, here it is.&nbsp; Nothing held back.1. I just finished typing a post in the General forum about PbPs and how they only work if the players are committed.&nbsp; Talk about making myself feel like a hypocrite.&nbsp; So, I realized that I should apologize first and foremost.2. All of what I said earlier in this thread was true, however.&nbsp; I didn't like playing in conflict between ideals between RA and myself over good/lawful.&nbsp; I wasn't really appreciative of alqways feeling like Rhaka's VoPness was counter-intuitive to the needs and goals of the party.&nbsp; Slowly my irritation crept into causing me to be not so committed to the game.&nbsp; Unfortunately, since I wasn't having fun it lead to a lack of committment.&nbsp; That's what the above apology is for.&nbsp; Not for what I said, but for letting my dislike of the conflict about my character to interfere.However, I also did like being a player in a PbP.&nbsp; [Don't get me wrong, I like DMing as well, and I hope my players like my DMing.]&nbsp; But it was nice to be a player.&nbsp; And ... I am interested in the actual story here.&nbsp; I just wish I was playing a character who could be more &quot;free&quot; about the story as well.So, here's what I'll propose.&nbsp; If you both feel it worthwhile, I'd like to continue with another character instead of Rhaka.&nbsp; I'd like to play something simple (non-caster) if possible.&nbsp; If this is acceptable to RA and if Unleashed would like to keep up the game, I'd also like to continue.&nbsp; I wouldn't mind trying again with a character that I can feel comfortable getting into their skin.It's an honest answer, but I also understand if I've already ruined it.&nbsp; I'm open to suggestions, really.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nonlethal Force, post: 3320112, member: 35788"] Okay, I realize that I am the one who started this debate and I suppose I should be the one to finish it. So, here it is. Nothing held back. 1. I just finished typing a post in the General forum about PbPs and how they only work if the players are committed. Talk about making myself feel like a hypocrite. So, I realized that I should apologize first and foremost. 2. All of what I said earlier in this thread was true, however. I didn't like playing in conflict between ideals between RA and myself over good/lawful. I wasn't really appreciative of alqways feeling like Rhaka's VoPness was counter-intuitive to the needs and goals of the party. Slowly my irritation crept into causing me to be not so committed to the game. Unfortunately, since I wasn't having fun it lead to a lack of committment. That's what the above apology is for. Not for what I said, but for letting my dislike of the conflict about my character to interfere. However, I also did like being a player in a PbP. [Don't get me wrong, I like DMing as well, and I hope my players like my DMing.] But it was nice to be a player. And ... I am interested in the actual story here. I just wish I was playing a character who could be more "free" about the story as well. So, here's what I'll propose. If you both feel it worthwhile, I'd like to continue with another character instead of Rhaka. I'd like to play something simple (non-caster) if possible. If this is acceptable to RA and if Unleashed would like to keep up the game, I'd also like to continue. I wouldn't mind trying again with a character that I can feel comfortable getting into their skin. It's an honest answer, but I also understand if I've already ruined it. I'm open to suggestions, really. [/QUOTE]

Verification