NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 5808945" data-attributes="member: 19675">What's your point?Like I said, I prefer limitations based on campaign reasons, not personal dislikes.  That gives me a coherent, understandable world-based reason for why I as a player cannot play a PC concept I have in mind.I did NOT say that restrictions based on personal dislikes ever prevented me from playing in some campaign...because none ever has.  I've been told countless times that Monks or Paladins were not permitted in a game due to DM preference.  In no case did those restrictions prevent me from playing in the game.Sometimes, it didn't even prevent me from playing the same concept using another class (or classes).  Don't want me to play a Monk?  Fine, I'll play a Shaman (if they're allowed), a Cleric or Favored Soul (both with IUC) and the Metamagic Touch Spell feat.Or, more commonly, I'll simply play something else- I've got thousands of PC concepts that just need to be dug out to be ready to play...If I were really intent on playing a Dragonborn fighter, but Dragonborn were not permitted, I might then ask if feats like Draconic Heritage were available, and if so, go from there.If it were strictly a M-E campaign, I'd design a warrior PC with scale mail (spiked?) and some kind of suitably "Draconic" weapon (Greatspear?)...and the skillset/multiclassing (whichever it took) to make & use alchemist's fire.  He'd be a member of the "Dragonborn" mercenary company (which may or may not be extant at the time of the campaign).</blockquote>

Verification