Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark Plemmons" data-source="post: 3499741" data-attributes="member: 1287">Sort of.  Last September (issue #119), David Kenzer said (edited for brevity):"Here's my view of what a movie review should entail... I promise that anyone that can deliver this will see print.  I'd also be happy for this sort of review to displace or at least share time with the Rant.A review of the movie...not a synopsis, but thoughts on what was great/sucked and why.What did the characters/plot do that would/wouldn't work in a game/RPG?This is the best part and I'm sorry to see that no one has ever hit the nail on the head regarding this.As a gamer I saw (blah blah) coming amile away and why (and because of experience in what game).  Other stuff related to games/gaming you saw in the move.  What games the movie characters probably play or would be good at.How this movie could be made into a board game/RPG etc. (not precisely how, but a "this would make a really kewl game of" and follow with 2-3 sentences, etc.Most important point: The overall column needn't be controversial but must evoke one or more emotions in the reader.  Reviews should be interesting to read: that's the sinle most important bit.  Look at John O'Neill's work and you'll find some boring stuff made interesting."As far as I know, no one's submitted anything.</blockquote>