Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
known-abusable 3.5 combos/techniques/etc.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Taraxia" data-source="post: 2955483" data-attributes="member: 42426"><p>None of these strike me as broken at all. In fact they all strike me as to be expected.</p><p></p><p>Note that _true strike_ is a Range: Personal spell, so you're hypothesizing a character with both Power Attack and either arcane spellcasting progression or UMD. Which isn't far out at all -- being able to do this is the definition of a gish build -- but it is going to weaken you compared to a simple fighter character. Remember that actions are *everything* in a D&D encounter, and that having to spend two rounds on this more than makes up for a guaranteed hit on a Power Attack.</p><p></p><p>You don't even need the wand of _speak with animals_ if you're a gnome. And you don't need the bag of tricks if you have a familiar or animal companion. I mean, all this "trick" does is replace a gnomish wizard if you don't have one. (And why wouldn't anyone want one?)</p><p></p><p>As for the ranged attack thing, sure. You're trading in attack bonus for all that. It's balanced.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This can appear broken, and people who spend a D&D session tripping (in whatever sense of the word) are really annoying, but a DM can smack this down by focusing on spellcasters and ranged attackers. Being Large isn't so great anymore when you're dodging ranged and ranged touch attacks. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, see above. The mighty spiked chain is annoying but can be countered.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See my earlier take on _explosive runes_. Note that, again, I prefer resolving things like this sequentially to resolving them "simultaneously", since the latter can lead to all kinds of troublesome rules difficulties besides this one. Just roll for random order.</p><p></p><p>Also, your PC had better be really really careful if he's storing hundreds of explosive runes just sitting around during downtime.</p><p></p><p>As for empowering the runes, sure. That's what metamagic is for, and the runes are harder to use than _fireball_. Metamagic *rods* I frequently worry about and don't really like having around in games. But they are, nonetheless, expensive (though Empower is not as expensive as I would like). Your low-level PCs shouldn't be able to buy Maximize unless they're really saving up for it and giving up some fairly major other purchases.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Er, yeah. This isn't a "trick". This is how the Magic domain is supposed to work. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>...And where are they getting powerful dead creatures, if they weren't powerful enough to kill them in the first place? It's insanely unrealistic to have the corpses of powerful monsters lying around in a "graveyard". At best they'd be in a laboratory or museum somewhere and cost a very great deal of effort to steal.</p><p></p><p>Note that bullettes live underground so their corpses are unlikely to be where even a very skilled Ranger could find them, and both nightmares and titans come from *another plane*.</p><p></p><p>The difficulty of *finding* a creature to reanimate is an essential balancing factor in _animate dead_, especially balancing it against spells like the _summon monster_ tree and so forth. If you ignore that factor and assume you can get any corpse you want out of thin air, of *course* you'll get unbalanced effects -- just like the unbalanced effect of assuming _polymorph_ works on any random monster from the MM regardless of whether your character has ever studied one, seen one or even heard of one. </p><p></p><p>The _desecrate_ effect is obviously meant more to give you 4 5-HD skeletons than 1 20-HD one. Not that 4 5-HD skeletons aren't powerful, but, well, they're not *that* powerful.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Enh. Leadership is powerful, yes, but it puts a lot of its power in the hands of the DM, who's allowed to manipulate what you get for the sake of balance in his campaign. If you want a lot of followers your mobility will be restricted in the long term, which can also be an issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Keep in mind followers can die, and dead followers decrease your Leadership modifier and make them harder to replace.</p><p></p><p>As for summons, yeah. This is half of what summons -- and summoners -- are good for at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>These aren't tricks. These are the only point of caltrops and tanglefoot bags.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this is less of a "trick" and more "one of the few ways non-spellcasters can stand a chance against spellcasters at range".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They are nice. I don't think they're unbalanced for their cost, though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just enforce multiclass XP penalties or some other means of controlling multiclassing if the barbarian dip gets out of hand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, it's nice. Remember to use the potential danger of bringing bags of holding into one as a balancing factor if you have to.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Err, where does it say this? It's extremely counterintuitive, if true.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you consistently do this to a ridiculous degree you'll end up more than just one level behind. It's the DM's job to make sure this doesn't get out of hand.</p><p></p><p>Magic items aren't an endless cascade anyway, remember: They cost GP and time as well as XP to make.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah. And this makes sense. Although a smart monster that recognizes what's going on can save its AoO for the important PC. (You never *have* to use an AoO if you have one. If you did, you could do cheese with things like _fire shield_.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like many attempts to apply real-world physics to D&D, there's no actual reason to think that this should work based on the RAW. Even if it did, it's really only notable for its "cool factor", not because it's at all useful. Realistically, the water couldn't move you all that fast -- 20 ft/rd for an average, unarmored character, based on the mass of the water being ejected. 9,000 gp to have to make a DC 12 Str check each round to poorly duplicate the effect of the _fly_ spell -- with *far less* maneuverability or speed -- isn't that great.</p><p></p><p>I would almost certainly rule that using the decanter causes instability the exact same way making attacks does for the levitating creature.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>...And using a horse outdoors is a "trick"... how?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And the whole deal with dropping things on people while flying over their heads isn't that easy. (In case you've never played a bomber flight sim, aiming while trying to drop things on people isn't that much easier than aiming while trying to throw things at people.) Following the wizards I'd make it an ordinary ranged attack using your BAB, which isn't going to be good if you're a caster.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This especially wouldn't work with the book, which counts as one object and is going to be completely destroyed as soon as the first _explosive runes_ goes off (the object on which the runes are written always takes full damage from it).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>_Acid fog_ is level 6, so no one can cast it before CL 11. Not a 10-or-lower trick.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And _forcecage_ is level 7. Lvl 6 and lvl 7 spells are *supposed* to be super-powerful -- this is the point at which you're entering mid-levels and becoming a legendary fighting force, and where enemies are going to have to use cleverness as well as brute strength to hurt you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See the _polymorph_ errata. The troglodyte is abusive, but the locathah is, I think, okay. Sensible thing to turn into if you're going to be going aquatic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you have 60,000 gp to blow on this -- which low-level characters really shouldn't -- then go right ahead. The _bag of holding_ is cheaper than the _portable hole_ but can't hold as much.</p><p></p><p>It's not really unbalancing in any way, since you have to have the ring gates, and get one gate where you need to go in the first place, in order to use it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Also not unbalanced.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Cute. If you're somehow conscious and capable of taking actions while inside the Tarrasque, of course. Which a low-level character won't be.</p><p></p><p>Note that you have to make a successful grapple check against the Tarrasque to do this (swallowed creatures are grappled).</p><p></p><p>Also, by RAW, this won't let you escape from the Tarrasque -- it'll just take the Tarrasque to the Astral Plane, with you inside it. A nice, self-sacrificial way to save the day, but you'll still die.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure. Also not that unbalancing. Not all that different from everyone using their move action to close with the same guy and do a full attack.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right, this is very annoying. If it were me I'd say that the dust *remains in the air* for the duration of the sneezing effect, forcing anyone who wants to take advantage of this to rely on ranged attacks and effects. Or just give the sneezing and choking a Fort save, which it really ought to have. (A 5d4 stun with no save is *way* too good for something at the dust's price.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nice effect. Still doesn't give you the maneuverability of _fly_, though, and if you can cast _overland flight_ you can cast _fly_.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Taraxia, post: 2955483, member: 42426"] None of these strike me as broken at all. In fact they all strike me as to be expected. Note that _true strike_ is a Range: Personal spell, so you're hypothesizing a character with both Power Attack and either arcane spellcasting progression or UMD. Which isn't far out at all -- being able to do this is the definition of a gish build -- but it is going to weaken you compared to a simple fighter character. Remember that actions are *everything* in a D&D encounter, and that having to spend two rounds on this more than makes up for a guaranteed hit on a Power Attack. You don't even need the wand of _speak with animals_ if you're a gnome. And you don't need the bag of tricks if you have a familiar or animal companion. I mean, all this "trick" does is replace a gnomish wizard if you don't have one. (And why wouldn't anyone want one?) As for the ranged attack thing, sure. You're trading in attack bonus for all that. It's balanced. This can appear broken, and people who spend a D&D session tripping (in whatever sense of the word) are really annoying, but a DM can smack this down by focusing on spellcasters and ranged attackers. Being Large isn't so great anymore when you're dodging ranged and ranged touch attacks. Yeah, see above. The mighty spiked chain is annoying but can be countered. See my earlier take on _explosive runes_. Note that, again, I prefer resolving things like this sequentially to resolving them "simultaneously", since the latter can lead to all kinds of troublesome rules difficulties besides this one. Just roll for random order. Also, your PC had better be really really careful if he's storing hundreds of explosive runes just sitting around during downtime. As for empowering the runes, sure. That's what metamagic is for, and the runes are harder to use than _fireball_. Metamagic *rods* I frequently worry about and don't really like having around in games. But they are, nonetheless, expensive (though Empower is not as expensive as I would like). Your low-level PCs shouldn't be able to buy Maximize unless they're really saving up for it and giving up some fairly major other purchases. Er, yeah. This isn't a "trick". This is how the Magic domain is supposed to work. ...And where are they getting powerful dead creatures, if they weren't powerful enough to kill them in the first place? It's insanely unrealistic to have the corpses of powerful monsters lying around in a "graveyard". At best they'd be in a laboratory or museum somewhere and cost a very great deal of effort to steal. Note that bullettes live underground so their corpses are unlikely to be where even a very skilled Ranger could find them, and both nightmares and titans come from *another plane*. The difficulty of *finding* a creature to reanimate is an essential balancing factor in _animate dead_, especially balancing it against spells like the _summon monster_ tree and so forth. If you ignore that factor and assume you can get any corpse you want out of thin air, of *course* you'll get unbalanced effects -- just like the unbalanced effect of assuming _polymorph_ works on any random monster from the MM regardless of whether your character has ever studied one, seen one or even heard of one. The _desecrate_ effect is obviously meant more to give you 4 5-HD skeletons than 1 20-HD one. Not that 4 5-HD skeletons aren't powerful, but, well, they're not *that* powerful. Enh. Leadership is powerful, yes, but it puts a lot of its power in the hands of the DM, who's allowed to manipulate what you get for the sake of balance in his campaign. If you want a lot of followers your mobility will be restricted in the long term, which can also be an issue. Keep in mind followers can die, and dead followers decrease your Leadership modifier and make them harder to replace. As for summons, yeah. This is half of what summons -- and summoners -- are good for at all. These aren't tricks. These are the only point of caltrops and tanglefoot bags. And this is less of a "trick" and more "one of the few ways non-spellcasters can stand a chance against spellcasters at range". They are nice. I don't think they're unbalanced for their cost, though. Just enforce multiclass XP penalties or some other means of controlling multiclassing if the barbarian dip gets out of hand. Yeah, it's nice. Remember to use the potential danger of bringing bags of holding into one as a balancing factor if you have to. Err, where does it say this? It's extremely counterintuitive, if true. If you consistently do this to a ridiculous degree you'll end up more than just one level behind. It's the DM's job to make sure this doesn't get out of hand. Magic items aren't an endless cascade anyway, remember: They cost GP and time as well as XP to make. Yeah. And this makes sense. Although a smart monster that recognizes what's going on can save its AoO for the important PC. (You never *have* to use an AoO if you have one. If you did, you could do cheese with things like _fire shield_.) Like many attempts to apply real-world physics to D&D, there's no actual reason to think that this should work based on the RAW. Even if it did, it's really only notable for its "cool factor", not because it's at all useful. Realistically, the water couldn't move you all that fast -- 20 ft/rd for an average, unarmored character, based on the mass of the water being ejected. 9,000 gp to have to make a DC 12 Str check each round to poorly duplicate the effect of the _fly_ spell -- with *far less* maneuverability or speed -- isn't that great. I would almost certainly rule that using the decanter causes instability the exact same way making attacks does for the levitating creature. ...And using a horse outdoors is a "trick"... how? And the whole deal with dropping things on people while flying over their heads isn't that easy. (In case you've never played a bomber flight sim, aiming while trying to drop things on people isn't that much easier than aiming while trying to throw things at people.) Following the wizards I'd make it an ordinary ranged attack using your BAB, which isn't going to be good if you're a caster. This especially wouldn't work with the book, which counts as one object and is going to be completely destroyed as soon as the first _explosive runes_ goes off (the object on which the runes are written always takes full damage from it). _Acid fog_ is level 6, so no one can cast it before CL 11. Not a 10-or-lower trick. And _forcecage_ is level 7. Lvl 6 and lvl 7 spells are *supposed* to be super-powerful -- this is the point at which you're entering mid-levels and becoming a legendary fighting force, and where enemies are going to have to use cleverness as well as brute strength to hurt you. See the _polymorph_ errata. The troglodyte is abusive, but the locathah is, I think, okay. Sensible thing to turn into if you're going to be going aquatic. If you have 60,000 gp to blow on this -- which low-level characters really shouldn't -- then go right ahead. The _bag of holding_ is cheaper than the _portable hole_ but can't hold as much. It's not really unbalancing in any way, since you have to have the ring gates, and get one gate where you need to go in the first place, in order to use it. Also not unbalanced. Cute. If you're somehow conscious and capable of taking actions while inside the Tarrasque, of course. Which a low-level character won't be. Note that you have to make a successful grapple check against the Tarrasque to do this (swallowed creatures are grappled). Also, by RAW, this won't let you escape from the Tarrasque -- it'll just take the Tarrasque to the Astral Plane, with you inside it. A nice, self-sacrificial way to save the day, but you'll still die. Sure. Also not that unbalancing. Not all that different from everyone using their move action to close with the same guy and do a full attack. Right, this is very annoying. If it were me I'd say that the dust *remains in the air* for the duration of the sneezing effect, forcing anyone who wants to take advantage of this to rely on ranged attacks and effects. Or just give the sneezing and choking a Fort save, which it really ought to have. (A 5d4 stun with no save is *way* too good for something at the dust's price.) Nice effect. Still doesn't give you the maneuverability of _fly_, though, and if you can cast _overland flight_ you can cast _fly_. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
known-abusable 3.5 combos/techniques/etc.
Top