Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Kobold Press Going Down a Dark Road
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 8984537" data-attributes="member: 7040132"><p>Their argument? If something someone say is dishonest, THEY ARE being dishonest. There is no difference. People say actions speak louder than words but speaking and writing words <em>are</em> actions. Misleading statements and lies are actions. KP says the following<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"> (though my own commentary is added as well):</span></p><p></p><p><strong>"1) 5th Edi<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">tion Core Rulebooks are going away. The 5E Monster Manual, Player’s Handbook, and Dungeon Master’s Guide will not stay in print."</span></strong></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">This claim is being misleading at best and outright deceptive at worst. The 2014 books will go out of print, sure, but the 2024 books will also be 5E and they won't be out of print. They are making this claim to support later claims that D&D <em>will</em> be non-physical, subscription-only, and that people <em>must</em> to go to a 3rd party to get physical book support, and ask that they consider being that 3pp.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><strong>"New players must either use purely digital rulebooks (which works for some people) or find a new version."</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">As mentioned above, here is the "must." Anyone who thinks that Wizards is going digital-only in 2024 is... not being honest with themselves, let alone people they are trying to convince/deceive. Wizards has even said they are publishing books in 2024, but likely not special editions at first printing.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><strong>We aim to keep the spirit of tabletop alive by producing beautiful, inviting versions of the core rulebooks for those who prefer to play face-to-face and those who don’t want to pay a monthly subscription to play.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">By saying they want to keep the spirit of TTRP "alive" they are saying it is dying. Really? Here we also see the subscription claim and that if you want to play face to face, you must go elsewhere.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><strong>We want to keep 5E vibrant and strong at the heart of a community of players and publishers. Your investment in 5E will be supported by Project Black Flag because it is compatible with the game you already know.</strong></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">Anyone paying attention knows that Wizards plans on the 2024 update being backwards compatible. Even if that is in doubt, KP is claiming it as a fact, which is misleading because they can't know yet. Do people really think that KPs changes will be less than Wizards changes? Or Level Up's? Heck, they have to create all new subclasses, and they are adding a L1 feat themselves, and they have to make all kinds of changes that hammer down the proud nails they don't like. They are literally making an entire new game, not just options. In fact, if their changes aren't as big as Level Up, I may not be interested. At least Level Up created what they considered an "Advanced" option of alternate books, and are putting their design chops up against Wizards'. If both Level Up and BF's games are considered 5E compatible, I am confident that the 2024 D&D rulebooks will be as well if held to the same standards. </span></p><p></p><p>They are claiming that they are the ones that can keep "5E" strong, but the only reason for making deceptive statements about 5E is to undermine whatever Wizards is working on. <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">All those misleading claims were planned, purposeful negative-marketing speak to support a later request to replace anything 5E with their own game. That is not "strong." </span>The entire ad is negative, pernicious, ad-speak intended to weaken Wizards. They want to sound like rebellious black flag flying pirates. Well they succeeded in my eyes. </p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">They should drop the negative speak and put their design skills up against their competitors, showing how they are awesome, encouraging each other to up their game (pun intended). <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">Heck, the D&D design team says they value and <em>want</em> 3rd party support as they can't create everything that different gamers want. I bet they buy 3pp books too! Many TTRPG designers are friendly industry acquaintances if not friends with each other and support each other. They don't want hostility.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">At least Wizards changed course when they were called out for making errors. I will hold any creator to the same standards. Just because Wizards messes up, it doesn't mean that other companies can't.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mirrorrorrim, post: 8984537, member: 7040132"] Their argument? If something someone say is dishonest, THEY ARE being dishonest. There is no difference. People say actions speak louder than words but speaking and writing words [I]are[/I] actions. Misleading statements and lies are actions. KP says the following[COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)] (though my own commentary is added as well):[/COLOR] [B]"1) 5th Edi[COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]tion Core Rulebooks are going away. The 5E Monster Manual, Player’s Handbook, and Dungeon Master’s Guide will not stay in print."[/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]This claim is being misleading at best and outright deceptive at worst. The 2014 books will go out of print, sure, but the 2024 books will also be 5E and they won't be out of print. They are making this claim to support later claims that D&D [I]will[/I] be non-physical, subscription-only, and that people [I]must[/I] to go to a 3rd party to get physical book support, and ask that they consider being that 3pp. [B]"New players must either use purely digital rulebooks (which works for some people) or find a new version."[/B] As mentioned above, here is the "must." Anyone who thinks that Wizards is going digital-only in 2024 is... not being honest with themselves, let alone people they are trying to convince/deceive. Wizards has even said they are publishing books in 2024, but likely not special editions at first printing. [B]We aim to keep the spirit of tabletop alive by producing beautiful, inviting versions of the core rulebooks for those who prefer to play face-to-face and those who don’t want to pay a monthly subscription to play.[/B] By saying they want to keep the spirit of TTRP "alive" they are saying it is dying. Really? Here we also see the subscription claim and that if you want to play face to face, you must go elsewhere. [B]We want to keep 5E vibrant and strong at the heart of a community of players and publishers. Your investment in 5E will be supported by Project Black Flag because it is compatible with the game you already know.[/B] Anyone paying attention knows that Wizards plans on the 2024 update being backwards compatible. Even if that is in doubt, KP is claiming it as a fact, which is misleading because they can't know yet. Do people really think that KPs changes will be less than Wizards changes? Or Level Up's? Heck, they have to create all new subclasses, and they are adding a L1 feat themselves, and they have to make all kinds of changes that hammer down the proud nails they don't like. They are literally making an entire new game, not just options. In fact, if their changes aren't as big as Level Up, I may not be interested. At least Level Up created what they considered an "Advanced" option of alternate books, and are putting their design chops up against Wizards'. If both Level Up and BF's games are considered 5E compatible, I am confident that the 2024 D&D rulebooks will be as well if held to the same standards. [/COLOR] They are claiming that they are the ones that can keep "5E" strong, but the only reason for making deceptive statements about 5E is to undermine whatever Wizards is working on. [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]All those misleading claims were planned, purposeful negative-marketing speak to support a later request to replace anything 5E with their own game. That is not "strong." [/COLOR]The entire ad is negative, pernicious, ad-speak intended to weaken Wizards. They want to sound like rebellious black flag flying pirates. Well they succeeded in my eyes. [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]They should drop the negative speak and put their design skills up against their competitors, showing how they are awesome, encouraging each other to up their game (pun intended). [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]Heck, the D&D design team says they value and [I]want[/I] 3rd party support as they can't create everything that different gamers want. I bet they buy 3pp books too! Many TTRPG designers are friendly industry acquaintances if not friends with each other and support each other. They don't want hostility. At least Wizards changed course when they were called out for making errors. I will hold any creator to the same standards. Just because Wizards messes up, it doesn't mean that other companies can't.[/COLOR][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Kobold Press Going Down a Dark Road
Top