Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 9462172" data-attributes="member: 6779310">Kobold's is a bit more "No AI"...But I suspect several WotC creatives are seeing their careers flash before their eyes given Cox's statements...Because they have said they don't use AI to generate text, generate art, nor generate rules... and here's Cox saying that WotC is going to be doing so. He's made a liar out of his creatives. He's basically said he plans to replace them, and DM's as well, in search of dollars.[USER=6884657]@orial[/USER] the WotC creatives were quite clear in their opposition to AI art and AI text in D&D rulebooks. Cox is clear he's not up on the law, since he talks about WotC owning the copyrights on the art in quotes from a third party - when the US Copyright Registrar has said the product of generative AI is not protectable content. Note that as an IP holding US Corporation, that's dispositive and prevents Hasbro from holding Copyrights on AI generated content.If it's true that there's AI content, Cox just nutted HasBro's IPs. At the very least, risking loss of copyright protection on potentially large chunks of content and/or fraud charges for failure to denote what elements are AI Generated.[URL unfurl="true"]https://copyrightalliance.org/ai-copyright-federal-government-activities/#:~:text=U.S.%20Copyright%20Office%20AI%20Activities&text=The%20Office%20explained%20that%20human,disclaimed%20on%20a%20registration%20application.[/URL]</blockquote>

Verification