Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Kobold That Walks, Round Two!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="moritheil" data-source="post: 4180857" data-attributes="member: 30610"><p>Thanks for your posts. I feel I should explain my last post and my mindset.</p><p></p><p>I have no doubt that they are nasty. The current PC group is just immune to many categories of things and are all competent powergamers to boot. It's not that a kobold can't be made into a decent fighter <em>relative to baseline standards</em>, it's that a kobold's strength in terms of optimization does not typically lie in melee. Thus, I had the party face mostly sorcerers and shugenja with warriors as fodder. Why warriors? Efficiency - kobolds pack more effectiveness per CR as warriors relative to fighters, because they get a discount to their CR and thus more hit dice. If I really wanted to mess with them using kobold melee I could break out Bo9S, but that is more complexity than it is worth for a bunch of expendable melee muscle.</p><p></p><p>When I run campaigns for optimizing players I prefer to optimize the monsters and keep things at minimal CR rather than faking it with higher CR encounters. That's a stylistic issue, and I recognize it as such. Since I think in terms of efficiency per CR, I tend to think that I could do a lot better than kobolds if I wanted melee muscle - say, the godspawn slayers of Tiamat. Actually, I need to use those at some point in time, since half the PC group is evil outsiders.</p><p></p><p>There were already three sets of traps on the way in, so I didn't have any actual traps in the climactic fight. I did have, as I mentioned, an altar with effects that hit non-LE characters that got too close, which might have had a traplike feel, as it was an unpleasant surprise for some.</p><p></p><p>FoP refers to the Fiend of Possession PrC and is one reason the use of dragons and other individually powerful monsters should be very carefully considered in this campaign - throwing them at a FoP simply means the FoP gets to spend the rest of the campaign inside this powerful body, wreaking havoc with it. Evil characters are especially easy for it to possess. Obviously possession is not foolproof, but failure to very carefully consider it will result in a broken or trivial campaign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="moritheil, post: 4180857, member: 30610"] Thanks for your posts. I feel I should explain my last post and my mindset. I have no doubt that they are nasty. The current PC group is just immune to many categories of things and are all competent powergamers to boot. It's not that a kobold can't be made into a decent fighter [i]relative to baseline standards[/i], it's that a kobold's strength in terms of optimization does not typically lie in melee. Thus, I had the party face mostly sorcerers and shugenja with warriors as fodder. Why warriors? Efficiency - kobolds pack more effectiveness per CR as warriors relative to fighters, because they get a discount to their CR and thus more hit dice. If I really wanted to mess with them using kobold melee I could break out Bo9S, but that is more complexity than it is worth for a bunch of expendable melee muscle. When I run campaigns for optimizing players I prefer to optimize the monsters and keep things at minimal CR rather than faking it with higher CR encounters. That's a stylistic issue, and I recognize it as such. Since I think in terms of efficiency per CR, I tend to think that I could do a lot better than kobolds if I wanted melee muscle - say, the godspawn slayers of Tiamat. Actually, I need to use those at some point in time, since half the PC group is evil outsiders. There were already three sets of traps on the way in, so I didn't have any actual traps in the climactic fight. I did have, as I mentioned, an altar with effects that hit non-LE characters that got too close, which might have had a traplike feel, as it was an unpleasant surprise for some. FoP refers to the Fiend of Possession PrC and is one reason the use of dragons and other individually powerful monsters should be very carefully considered in this campaign - throwing them at a FoP simply means the FoP gets to spend the rest of the campaign inside this powerful body, wreaking havoc with it. Evil characters are especially easy for it to possess. Obviously possession is not foolproof, but failure to very carefully consider it will result in a broken or trivial campaign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Kobold That Walks, Round Two!
Top