Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lizard" data-source="post: 4247304" data-attributes="member: 1054">Everything describing marks makes sense, UNTIL you get to the "one makr supersedes another" balance rule. Why can't TWO fighter both decide to focus all their attention on the same Big Bad? Because in playtest, this proved too powerful and nerfing marks was not the preferred solution.In discussion with the other potential 4e DM, it was proposed that we just accept that 4e "martial" powers have a tinge of supernatural energy, and maybe each character with mark ought to come up with some cool flavor text for how their mark looks/acts. (In our games, PCs are expected to describe spells, powers, etc, in ways that are unique to them; everyone has their own little shtick.)</blockquote>