Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="moticon" data-source="post: 4239659" data-attributes="member: 20701">Tonight we kicked off 4E around here and things went well for the first few hours... Not wanting to give anything away... The party suffered a TPK when the paladin charged into a group of enemies and was brought down quickly.. this was followed by a series of bad rolls by the PC's and a series of good rolls by the enemies...Net result, after 4 hours all were dead...Comments, the &quot;Walord&quot;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> was not too powerful.&nbsp; The party played without the rogue and dwarf fighter (yes there were only 4 PC's) and we believe they missed the fighter or the rogue, each would have been better for battle than the warlock as built.. I&quot;m hoping the warlord will have more options and be able to be better built than this one.. The player is a good player, but things didn't go well for the &quot;Walord&quot;...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="moticon, post: 4239659, member: 20701"] Tonight we kicked off 4E around here and things went well for the first few hours... Not wanting to give anything away... The party suffered a TPK when the paladin charged into a group of enemies and was brought down quickly.. this was followed by a series of bad rolls by the PC's and a series of good rolls by the enemies... Net result, after 4 hours all were dead... Comments, the "Walord" ;) was not too powerful. The party played without the rogue and dwarf fighter (yes there were only 4 PC's) and we believe they missed the fighter or the rogue, each would have been better for battle than the warlock as built.. I"m hoping the warlord will have more options and be able to be better built than this one.. The player is a good player, but things didn't go well for the "Walord"... [/QUOTE]

Verification