Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
L&L 3/11/2013 This Week in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6100832" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>OK, so by this logic nobody from WotC should ever say anything at all... Obviously this is ridiculous. Mike etc make statements every day about what they are planning on delivering, reasons they are doing specific things, etc. All of it is of course at some level contingent but they still DO make such statements. So why is it that somehow magically making statements that would tell us what 4e-like game support is upcoming are mysteriously taboo and ill-advised when all the other statements aren't (or they are making them anyway, whichever)? </p><p></p><p>In otherwords, sure they can throw the 4e fans that are their current paying customers a bone, surely. Yes, they have stated that IN THEORY "all editions will be supported", but they've also demonstrated a shocking lack of appreciation for what makes 4e interesting to many of us, and again not one single feature, word, etc of any specific that would relate to 4e has ever come forth. The system as currently designed is in fact fairly antithetical to what I would call 4e-like play and will need some deep hacking to work for what say O'brynn, Pemerton, Manbearcat, or myself would (I think) consider a 4e-like experience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6100832, member: 82106"] OK, so by this logic nobody from WotC should ever say anything at all... Obviously this is ridiculous. Mike etc make statements every day about what they are planning on delivering, reasons they are doing specific things, etc. All of it is of course at some level contingent but they still DO make such statements. So why is it that somehow magically making statements that would tell us what 4e-like game support is upcoming are mysteriously taboo and ill-advised when all the other statements aren't (or they are making them anyway, whichever)? In otherwords, sure they can throw the 4e fans that are their current paying customers a bone, surely. Yes, they have stated that IN THEORY "all editions will be supported", but they've also demonstrated a shocking lack of appreciation for what makes 4e interesting to many of us, and again not one single feature, word, etc of any specific that would relate to 4e has ever come forth. The system as currently designed is in fact fairly antithetical to what I would call 4e-like play and will need some deep hacking to work for what say O'brynn, Pemerton, Manbearcat, or myself would (I think) consider a 4e-like experience. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
L&L 3/11/2013 This Week in D&D
Top