Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="am181d" data-source="post: 5882164" data-attributes="member: 3576">The list of monster books assumes Wizards has made the best monster books? (Surely a lot of us would have picked Monsternomicon or Tome of Horrors as our favorite monster book.)There was no way for 2nd Edition Grognards to indicate their preference for the binder format?The checklist of monsters with an other box, made it very hard to guess what monsters were assumed and what would need to be written in?The one thing I gleaned from the survey is that someone at WotC probably wants to figure out how to make the MM a player supplement, which I'm torn on. On the one hand, it's a rotten idea. On the other hand, it does make sense to put some monster race stuff in there. (For instance, I would be OK with having the rules for some of the Eberron races only appear in the MM if that gave them a better shot of inclusion in the initial set of books.)</blockquote>