Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
L&L 4/16 - A Walk Down Monster Lane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cerebral Paladin" data-source="post: 5884056" data-attributes="member: 3448"><p>To my mind, centaurs didn't appear in the 4E MM and aren't in many adventures precisely because they fall into the awkward "not really a monster (in the evil/killing them for their loot is fine for good parties) but not a basic PC race/likely race for henchfolk" space. In some ways, its similar to blink dogs, except that blink dogs are more clearly good. You can totally have centaurs that the PCs fight. You can also totally have fun, interesting interactions with centaurs that PCs don't fight. But 4E's MM was totally "the book of things to kill" and D&D centaurs are a little awkward for presenting as "just another monster to kill." </p><p></p><p>I think that philosophy was misguided, and I checked the box for centaurs (one of the few boxes I checked--I'd like to see most of those critters in a MM eventually, but there are only a handful that I'd really feel disappointed that they were missing if they're not in the first monster book/boxed set/whatever.) But I can understand why they would be viewed as more marginal than, say, orcs or dragons or beholders or mindflayers or ogres or displacer beasts or other iconic to the point of "any reasonable initial D&D monster book needs to include these." For me, centaurs fall into the category of "should be included in the initial D&D monster book, but many reasonable versions of it wouldn't include them."</p><p></p><p>And hopefully, if lots of us checked the centaur box, the whole issue will be moot--WotC will see that lots of people want centaurs and will include them.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, there's certainly room for a more mythologically grounded version of centaurs who are primarily raiders and bandits and rampaging hordes who could be treated as straight up monsters--an "often chaotic evil" alignment sort of category--but that's not typically how D&D has presented them. And because that's not how D&D has typically used them, I would prefer for the default centaurs to be the neutralish horse people, with the rampaging half-horse, half-human centaurs presented as "some tribes of centaurs skew towards evil and chaos" instead of giving up D&Dness to get more mythological.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cerebral Paladin, post: 5884056, member: 3448"] To my mind, centaurs didn't appear in the 4E MM and aren't in many adventures precisely because they fall into the awkward "not really a monster (in the evil/killing them for their loot is fine for good parties) but not a basic PC race/likely race for henchfolk" space. In some ways, its similar to blink dogs, except that blink dogs are more clearly good. You can totally have centaurs that the PCs fight. You can also totally have fun, interesting interactions with centaurs that PCs don't fight. But 4E's MM was totally "the book of things to kill" and D&D centaurs are a little awkward for presenting as "just another monster to kill." I think that philosophy was misguided, and I checked the box for centaurs (one of the few boxes I checked--I'd like to see most of those critters in a MM eventually, but there are only a handful that I'd really feel disappointed that they were missing if they're not in the first monster book/boxed set/whatever.) But I can understand why they would be viewed as more marginal than, say, orcs or dragons or beholders or mindflayers or ogres or displacer beasts or other iconic to the point of "any reasonable initial D&D monster book needs to include these." For me, centaurs fall into the category of "should be included in the initial D&D monster book, but many reasonable versions of it wouldn't include them." And hopefully, if lots of us checked the centaur box, the whole issue will be moot--WotC will see that lots of people want centaurs and will include them. As an aside, there's certainly room for a more mythologically grounded version of centaurs who are primarily raiders and bandits and rampaging hordes who could be treated as straight up monsters--an "often chaotic evil" alignment sort of category--but that's not typically how D&D has presented them. And because that's not how D&D has typically used them, I would prefer for the default centaurs to be the neutralish horse people, with the rampaging half-horse, half-human centaurs presented as "some tribes of centaurs skew towards evil and chaos" instead of giving up D&Dness to get more mythological. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
L&L 4/16 - A Walk Down Monster Lane
Top