Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
L&L 8/19/13: The Final Countdown
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sage Genesis" data-source="post: 6171461" data-attributes="member: 6706099"><p>That's because they're Barnum Statements. I encourage everybody to read up on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forer_effect" target="_blank">the Forer effect.</a> This is not only helpful to discuss this article but also in life in general.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It sounds like you bought directly into the Barnum statements. That's not an attack or flaw on your part, it's the most common and natural response in the world.</p><p></p><p>You have extrapolated certain meanings from short sentences that just happen to line up with your personal preferences. And so the statements sound good to you. However, it's also possible to extrapolate different meanings from them. Like, statements that directly support 4e as written on launch day.</p><p></p><p>For example: "You like simplicity. You want to jump into the game quickly, create characters, monsters, NPCs, and adventures with a minimum of fuss, and get down to the business of playing D&D" </p><p></p><p>Well, I happen to think 4e is very simple. All effects are neatly presented in a power block format that convey the most information in the least amount of text, rather than having to divine the hidden meaning from several paragraphs of prose. Encounters are created with a dirt-simple budget of points and new monsters have most of their stats based on level and role, so I won't need to calculate the exact attack bonus based on creature type, HD, size, ability scores, feats, etc like in 3e. In 4e I can very quickly and easily sit down to play. So yes, this statement applies to 4e!</p><p></p><p>"You like that every class has the potential to contribute in most situations, but you're OK with some classes being better at certain things if that fits the class's image. You see balance on a larger, adventure-based or campaign-based scale."</p><p></p><p>Well of course! That's why the Rogue has double the amount of trained skills when compared to a Fighter. That's why Wizards get free rituals (as well as better non-combat utility powers). All three of them can contribute in most situations, but in most skill challenges it won't be the Fighter that shines as brightly as the other two. Yep, this one also applies to 4e!</p><p></p><p>I'm not going to go over the other statements because I'm pressed for time but trust me when I say I can make the entire article read like a glowing support of 4e's approach. You might think to yourself that I'm twisting the meaning of the statements here, but that's the trick of Barnum statements: there was never any meaning. Whatever you think the article says is what you put there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sage Genesis, post: 6171461, member: 6706099"] That's because they're Barnum Statements. I encourage everybody to read up on [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forer_effect]the Forer effect.[/url] This is not only helpful to discuss this article but also in life in general. It sounds like you bought directly into the Barnum statements. That's not an attack or flaw on your part, it's the most common and natural response in the world. You have extrapolated certain meanings from short sentences that just happen to line up with your personal preferences. And so the statements sound good to you. However, it's also possible to extrapolate different meanings from them. Like, statements that directly support 4e as written on launch day. For example: "You like simplicity. You want to jump into the game quickly, create characters, monsters, NPCs, and adventures with a minimum of fuss, and get down to the business of playing D&D" Well, I happen to think 4e is very simple. All effects are neatly presented in a power block format that convey the most information in the least amount of text, rather than having to divine the hidden meaning from several paragraphs of prose. Encounters are created with a dirt-simple budget of points and new monsters have most of their stats based on level and role, so I won't need to calculate the exact attack bonus based on creature type, HD, size, ability scores, feats, etc like in 3e. In 4e I can very quickly and easily sit down to play. So yes, this statement applies to 4e! "You like that every class has the potential to contribute in most situations, but you're OK with some classes being better at certain things if that fits the class's image. You see balance on a larger, adventure-based or campaign-based scale." Well of course! That's why the Rogue has double the amount of trained skills when compared to a Fighter. That's why Wizards get free rituals (as well as better non-combat utility powers). All three of them can contribute in most situations, but in most skill challenges it won't be the Fighter that shines as brightly as the other two. Yep, this one also applies to 4e! I'm not going to go over the other statements because I'm pressed for time but trust me when I say I can make the entire article read like a glowing support of 4e's approach. You might think to yourself that I'm twisting the meaning of the statements here, but that's the trick of Barnum statements: there was never any meaning. Whatever you think the article says is what you put there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
L&L 8/19/13: The Final Countdown
Top