Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Serendipity" data-source="post: 5909360" data-attributes="member: 18216">Not a single mention of rituals.&nbsp; I'd be happy if they kept them (in some capacity) and maintained a lack of class based restrictions on them honestly.&nbsp; Kind of iffy about the rest of it, though. Dangerous magic?&nbsp; Yes, more please, but then I've got the DCC RPG for that.&nbsp; I really don't think they'll go anywhere NEAR as far with it as that.&nbsp; Too much whinymage would ensue. (Though I don't expect it would be core anyway, nor would I expect it to be.)I'm all for (generally) reducing the number of spell slots to a more manageable number.&nbsp; Flattening the scalability of some of the spells I'm fine with, if only because it implies that giant rats with 20 hp won't be the norm again (Yes, I know that's hyperbole thanks).In short, okay with some of it, don't really care about the rest (the whole balance thing, for example, I could care less about).&nbsp;&nbsp; Very much still looking forward to the 24th.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Serendipity, post: 5909360, member: 18216"] Not a single mention of rituals. I'd be happy if they kept them (in some capacity) and maintained a lack of class based restrictions on them honestly. Kind of iffy about the rest of it, though. Dangerous magic? Yes, more please, but then I've got the DCC RPG for that. I really don't think they'll go anywhere NEAR as far with it as that. Too much whinymage would ensue. (Though I don't expect it would be core anyway, nor would I expect it to be.) I'm all for (generally) reducing the number of spell slots to a more manageable number. Flattening the scalability of some of the spells I'm fine with, if only because it implies that giant rats with 20 hp won't be the norm again (Yes, I know that's hyperbole thanks). In short, okay with some of it, don't really care about the rest (the whole balance thing, for example, I could care less about). Very much still looking forward to the 24th. [/QUOTE]

Verification