Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[L&L] Balancing the Wizards in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 5911898" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>So the question I would ask, KM... is what needs to appear in the book for it to be considered a "module"?</p><p></p><p>For the sake of argument... if we say that in 5E the spells <em>Prestidigitation, Open/Close, Mend, Light, Mage Hand</em>, and <em>Magic Missile</em> are all at-will... when does the book then need to say to make them "modular" that would be satisfactory?</p><p></p><p>Could it be as simple as a single sentence stating "For a more classic spellcasting feel, these spells are not considered at-will, but that you can cast any of them as many times equal to the number of Level 1 spells slots you have per day"? Or does there need to be a Level 0 line in the spell slot chart and a more detailed paragraph about how cantrips get used and how often?</p><p></p><p>Would either of these actually work, or does there need to be something more to it than that? (And to be completely fair about it... we can also look at it the other way, which has those spells <em>not</em> at-will as baseline, and instead includes a sentence in the wizard section that states that for a more magical wizard those Level 0 cantrips can be changed to "at-will" upon agreement with the DM.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 5911898, member: 7006"] So the question I would ask, KM... is what needs to appear in the book for it to be considered a "module"? For the sake of argument... if we say that in 5E the spells [I]Prestidigitation, Open/Close, Mend, Light, Mage Hand[/I], and [I]Magic Missile[/I] are all at-will... when does the book then need to say to make them "modular" that would be satisfactory? Could it be as simple as a single sentence stating "For a more classic spellcasting feel, these spells are not considered at-will, but that you can cast any of them as many times equal to the number of Level 1 spells slots you have per day"? Or does there need to be a Level 0 line in the spell slot chart and a more detailed paragraph about how cantrips get used and how often? Would either of these actually work, or does there need to be something more to it than that? (And to be completely fair about it... we can also look at it the other way, which has those spells [I]not[/I] at-will as baseline, and instead includes a sentence in the wizard section that states that for a more magical wizard those Level 0 cantrips can be changed to "at-will" upon agreement with the DM.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[L&L] Balancing the Wizards in D&D
Top