Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[L&L] Balancing the Wizards in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DMKastmaria" data-source="post: 5912751" data-attributes="member: 6678082"><p>I <em><strong>still </strong></em>disagree with your assessment of how much those players can contribute. I'm also not "settling for less design wise." Neither 3.x nor 4e suite my purposes, design wise. That's all. </p><p></p><p>There's been alternatives to D&D for quite a while. And people who disliked the system, back in the day. So, they played Runequest, Warhammer, Rolemaster and dozens of lesser known systems. But, some people actually <em>liked </em> D&D and AD&D. There's quite a few who <em>still </em>prefer those systems. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>My games have always been combat heavy. My players and I like it that way. Thieves and MU's, too. Honestly, have fun playing what you're playing, but you're making an awful lot of presumptuous statements about what everyone else is thinking, used to think, how they "used to" play, etc.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Most people who frequent EnWorld and WotC Forums, no doubt. Balance is a big deal in 4e. Not so much in AD&D. Player skill and player agency is far more of a deciding factor. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>The WotC editions have been the story of the designers trying to fix AD&D. They've yet to please a majority of their fanbase. I'd like it if they took a cue from the LBB's and made a simple, base game and told everyone to make their own bloody modules for it! Then, EnWorld would be a much more interesting place. </p><p></p><p>This is the secret of the OSR's success. We're mostly DIY D&D'ers. That kind of creativity and enthusiasm is what fostered the games' growth in the 70's. It's why, whatever 5e turns out to be, the OSR and the OGL ain't going nowhere. </p><p></p><p>And this is really the only reason I'm interested in 5e. Because there's a real possibility that its very nature, being modular, will inspire and spawn a whole slew of creative DM's, <strong>who'll take that system and turn it into whatever they please! </strong></p><p></p><p>I'm not looking for 5e to be a game I'll want to play. What I want is for all those EnWorld posters who, before the playtest has even been released, are writing up rules, tweaks and discussing ideas, to hold onto and continue developing the systems and subsystems they're making today. And then unleash a slew of new publications like the <em>Arduin Grimoires</em>, and <em>Alarums & Excursions</em>, or to compare with more recent offerings, </p><p><em>Fight On!</em>, <em>Knockspell</em>, and <em>Loviatar.</em></p><p></p><p>Look at what that kind of creativity and enthusiasm has wrought in the OSR. Look at what the fanbase has created, in the past 5 years! And how the audience and body of work for those "dead systems" has grown!</p><p></p><p>If WotC wants 5e to be a success, if the fanbase wants it, then the fans need to take things into their own hands! Assuming, that WotC will stay out of their way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DMKastmaria, post: 5912751, member: 6678082"] I [I][B]still [/B][/I]disagree with your assessment of how much those players can contribute. I'm also not "settling for less design wise." Neither 3.x nor 4e suite my purposes, design wise. That's all. There's been alternatives to D&D for quite a while. And people who disliked the system, back in the day. So, they played Runequest, Warhammer, Rolemaster and dozens of lesser known systems. But, some people actually [I]liked [/I] D&D and AD&D. There's quite a few who [I]still [/I]prefer those systems. My games have always been combat heavy. My players and I like it that way. Thieves and MU's, too. Honestly, have fun playing what you're playing, but you're making an awful lot of presumptuous statements about what everyone else is thinking, used to think, how they "used to" play, etc. Most people who frequent EnWorld and WotC Forums, no doubt. Balance is a big deal in 4e. Not so much in AD&D. Player skill and player agency is far more of a deciding factor. The WotC editions have been the story of the designers trying to fix AD&D. They've yet to please a majority of their fanbase. I'd like it if they took a cue from the LBB's and made a simple, base game and told everyone to make their own bloody modules for it! Then, EnWorld would be a much more interesting place. This is the secret of the OSR's success. We're mostly DIY D&D'ers. That kind of creativity and enthusiasm is what fostered the games' growth in the 70's. It's why, whatever 5e turns out to be, the OSR and the OGL ain't going nowhere. And this is really the only reason I'm interested in 5e. Because there's a real possibility that its very nature, being modular, will inspire and spawn a whole slew of creative DM's, [B]who'll take that system and turn it into whatever they please! [/B] I'm not looking for 5e to be a game I'll want to play. What I want is for all those EnWorld posters who, before the playtest has even been released, are writing up rules, tweaks and discussing ideas, to hold onto and continue developing the systems and subsystems they're making today. And then unleash a slew of new publications like the [I]Arduin Grimoires[/I], and [I]Alarums & Excursions[/I], or to compare with more recent offerings, [I]Fight On![/I], [I]Knockspell[/I], and [I]Loviatar.[/I] Look at what that kind of creativity and enthusiasm has wrought in the OSR. Look at what the fanbase has created, in the past 5 years! And how the audience and body of work for those "dead systems" has grown! If WotC wants 5e to be a success, if the fanbase wants it, then the fans need to take things into their own hands! Assuming, that WotC will stay out of their way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[L&L] Balancing the Wizards in D&D
Top