Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 6221544" data-attributes="member: 63508">I think many are reading into the artivle wrong.The purpose of the priority is to make sense of the world's mechanics to the gamers.For example, rangers are great trackers by default. If you need tracking, your ranger can do it and do it very well. Your cleric could learn tracking from their background. The ranger would be better though sincerangers get tracking from class while clerics get tracking from background. The party wizard could be a tracker too via spells. The wizard would be a better tracker than the cleric because spells &gt; background. The ranger would be better than both as tracking as a specific class feature is better than a single tracking spell or tracking from background skill proficiency. That's why rangers exist. They are the best default tracker.But if the wizard took the guide background for tracking , the combination of preparing a few tracking spells and backgound could be stronger than the ranger's tracking. Which is okay as the wizard sacrificed 2-3 things to do that. And if the ranger putsmore resources into tracking, they beat wizards at tracking again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 6221544, member: 63508"] I think many are reading into the artivle wrong. The purpose of the priority is to make sense of the world's mechanics to the gamers. For example, rangers are great trackers by default. If you need tracking, your ranger can do it and do it very well. Your cleric [I]could[/I] learn tracking from their background. The ranger would be better though sincerangers get tracking from[B] class[/B] while clerics get tracking from [B]background.[/B] The party wizard could be a tracker too via [B]spells[/B]. The wizard would be a better tracker than the cleric because [B]spells[/B] > [B]background[/B]. The ranger would be better than both as [B]tracking as a specific class feature[/B] is better than [B]a single tracking spell[/B] or [b]tracking from background skill proficiency[/b]. That's why rangers exist. They are the best default tracker. But if the wizard took the guide background for tracking , the combination of preparing a few tracking [B]spells and backgound[/B] could be stronger than the ranger's tracking. Which is okay as the wizard sacrificed 2-3 things to do that. And if the ranger putsmore resources into tracking, they beat wizards at tracking again. [/QUOTE]

Verification