Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kinak" data-source="post: 6103447" data-attributes="member: 6694112">Let's see...Druid - I like the specified forms and the choice of circles. Hound seems a bit weird, but it sounds like they're moving in a good direction here.Paladin - I like how they split out alignments. It sounds like have a solution to the problems bringing your mount along that they failed to mention. Another promising class.Ranger - This is exactly what I don't want for a ranger. Our group has always gone straight for spell-less rangers and the pseudo-favored-enemy thing sits wrong with me. I'd prefer something more along the lines of Quarry if we're going to represent that.Math - Less player damage is good. Also thank goodness for getting rid of martial damage dice.Fighter - Switching back to expertise dice is a good step. I'm not a big fan of adding them to attack or AC. Resting a round to restore one die also seems pretty useless, but at least we're heading back towards what worked.Races - Simpler is better.Exploration Rules - Actually including them is good <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Overall, things sound mixed, but there's enough meat there to make it worth exploring and seeing what's up. Looking forward to seeing them Wednesday.Cheers!Kinak</blockquote>