Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
L&L: These are not the rules you're looking for
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 5862244" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Well, why don't we look at the actual game mechanics that are given to a specific class to have it become a member of that Role.</p><p></p><p>The Defender classes: All have a Marking ability, and all have a punishment ability that occurs when the Mark is disregarded. They also tend to have high AC and high hit points.</p><p></p><p>The Striker classes: All have abilities or power add-ons that add extra damage or extra dice of damage on top of the normal damage their powers do.</p><p></p><p>The Leader classes: All have a 'Word'-esque power that allows them to 'heal' twice in an encounter. They also have powers that tend to buff their compatriots or let them do extra helpful things.</p><p></p><p>The Controller classes: All tend to have more frequent use of AoE abilities and attacks, and more abilities that debuff the enemies on the battlefield close and at range.</p><p></p><p>Now let's be honest here... is there any reason these abilities for these "roles" couldn't get layered on top of more classes than what 4E has? No, not at all. There's no reason why a Druid with an animal companion couldn't have a defender's marking mechanics for the companion, or why a Wizard couldn't have additional striker damage on their evocation spells (at the expense of losing some of his debuffing spells), or why a Monk couldn't lay on hands, or a Rogue couldn't control the battlefield with poisons, smokebombs, caltrops, alchemical fire and the like. After all... we've already seen this in Essentials, with some classes getting new roles (the Hunter Ranger being a controller, the Slayer Fighter being a striker, and the Sentinel Druid being a leader.) These choices don't necessarily <em>need</em> to be hardwired automatically into any specific class... the abilities that lend themselves to a certain role could easily be made available to all classes and chosen by the player during character creation to help do what they want to do with their character. So that if the Cleric of the God of War wants to be heavily armored and punish those enemies who move away from him on the field of battle, can have the ability to do so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 5862244, member: 7006"] Well, why don't we look at the actual game mechanics that are given to a specific class to have it become a member of that Role. The Defender classes: All have a Marking ability, and all have a punishment ability that occurs when the Mark is disregarded. They also tend to have high AC and high hit points. The Striker classes: All have abilities or power add-ons that add extra damage or extra dice of damage on top of the normal damage their powers do. The Leader classes: All have a 'Word'-esque power that allows them to 'heal' twice in an encounter. They also have powers that tend to buff their compatriots or let them do extra helpful things. The Controller classes: All tend to have more frequent use of AoE abilities and attacks, and more abilities that debuff the enemies on the battlefield close and at range. Now let's be honest here... is there any reason these abilities for these "roles" couldn't get layered on top of more classes than what 4E has? No, not at all. There's no reason why a Druid with an animal companion couldn't have a defender's marking mechanics for the companion, or why a Wizard couldn't have additional striker damage on their evocation spells (at the expense of losing some of his debuffing spells), or why a Monk couldn't lay on hands, or a Rogue couldn't control the battlefield with poisons, smokebombs, caltrops, alchemical fire and the like. After all... we've already seen this in Essentials, with some classes getting new roles (the Hunter Ranger being a controller, the Slayer Fighter being a striker, and the Sentinel Druid being a leader.) These choices don't necessarily [I]need[/I] to be hardwired automatically into any specific class... the abilities that lend themselves to a certain role could easily be made available to all classes and chosen by the player during character creation to help do what they want to do with their character. So that if the Cleric of the God of War wants to be heavily armored and punish those enemies who move away from him on the field of battle, can have the ability to do so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
L&L: These are not the rules you're looking for
Top