Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
L4W Discussion Thread IV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 5085970" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>I don't mind to be a part-time character reviewer as well.</p><p></p><p>Is there a list of characters that still need to be reviewed? I am fairly certain that the <a href="http://www.enworld.org/wiki/index.php/Category:L4W:Requesting_Approval" target="_blank">L4W:Requesting Approval</a> page is not a good list, since anyone who has just started their character and not necessarily requested approval will appear there (since the link is in the sample character page that everyone copies), and since there are 87 characters in that list it would be difficult to cross-reference each one to make sure that if they have been checked, it was by a judge and not another non-judge checker. Plus, given the length of the list, I have to imagine some folks are probably there erroneously for other reasons.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately the most useful list would be one that contains only characters who have contacted the judges and who have been approved by either zero people or one judge. (If it also included the date of the original request, so as to give a preference for order, that would be even better.) These are the only characters that non-judge character-checkers can examine, correct? (Also I'm assuming this list would contain both "original character" requests and "level up" requests, right?) I guess then character checkers could "claim" a PC (so we wouldn't all do double-work at the same time) and then set about checking them?</p><p></p><p>I apologize if such a list exists and I haven't found it or it has been posted and I haven't seen it (or if all of this is explained somewhere and I haven't found it), but can one of the judges assist with this? Or have the judges just been emailing/PMing folks?</p><p></p><p>Additionally, once a character is checked, I'm guessing the checker should then ...send an email and cc the judges? Is that the correct thing to do? Or is this again something that is explained somewhere?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 5085970, member: 9789"] I don't mind to be a part-time character reviewer as well. Is there a list of characters that still need to be reviewed? I am fairly certain that the [URL="http://www.enworld.org/wiki/index.php/Category:L4W:Requesting_Approval"]L4W:Requesting Approval[/URL] page is not a good list, since anyone who has just started their character and not necessarily requested approval will appear there (since the link is in the sample character page that everyone copies), and since there are 87 characters in that list it would be difficult to cross-reference each one to make sure that if they have been checked, it was by a judge and not another non-judge checker. Plus, given the length of the list, I have to imagine some folks are probably there erroneously for other reasons. Ultimately the most useful list would be one that contains only characters who have contacted the judges and who have been approved by either zero people or one judge. (If it also included the date of the original request, so as to give a preference for order, that would be even better.) These are the only characters that non-judge character-checkers can examine, correct? (Also I'm assuming this list would contain both "original character" requests and "level up" requests, right?) I guess then character checkers could "claim" a PC (so we wouldn't all do double-work at the same time) and then set about checking them? I apologize if such a list exists and I haven't found it or it has been posted and I haven't seen it (or if all of this is explained somewhere and I haven't found it), but can one of the judges assist with this? Or have the judges just been emailing/PMing folks? Additionally, once a character is checked, I'm guessing the checker should then ...send an email and cc the judges? Is that the correct thing to do? Or is this again something that is explained somewhere? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
L4W Discussion Thread IV
Top