Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
L4W Discussion Thread V
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5915111" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Odd that you see it this way. That is a general item rule stating that the item has to be wielded or used as opposed to the specific rule about weapons. I'm not seeing where a general items rule trumps a specific weapon items rule (which is not applicable to any other items, just weapons).</p><p></p><p>With the AV rule, it states to gain the benefits of the property:</p><p></p><p>1) PC must wield weapon.</p><p>2) Properties only apply to powers used with weapon.</p><p></p><p>Vs. Essentials.</p><p></p><p>1) PC must wield (or use) item.</p><p></p><p>An omission of a specific rule in the new rules shouldn't necessarily be an indication that the old specific rule is invalid and that it is now superceded by the new general rule.</p><p></p><p>Effectively, the "Unless otherwise noted" clause of the Essentials rule for items is invoked by the "weapons property rule" of AV. The AV rule is an "otherwise note". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I did a "double check the Compendium" and my eyes glazed over it. Doh! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>To me, this seems like a case of the designers from day one wanting the PCs to use the powers through the weapon in order to gain weapon benefits like properties. There hasn't been one rules quote posted so far (including your Esseentials one) which explicitly indicates otherwise. The AV rule, though, is very explicit concerning weapons.</p><p></p><p>Granted, the Essentials rule does give an explicit general items rule and if someone were <strong>only</strong> using Essentials rules, then that would be the proper interpretation. But as far as I know, PBP on EnWorld (unless otherwise noted <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />) uses all of the rules. A new general rule would overrule an old general rule, but it wouldn't overrule an old specific rule. Apples and Oranges. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5915111, member: 2011"] Odd that you see it this way. That is a general item rule stating that the item has to be wielded or used as opposed to the specific rule about weapons. I'm not seeing where a general items rule trumps a specific weapon items rule (which is not applicable to any other items, just weapons). With the AV rule, it states to gain the benefits of the property: 1) PC must wield weapon. 2) Properties only apply to powers used with weapon. Vs. Essentials. 1) PC must wield (or use) item. An omission of a specific rule in the new rules shouldn't necessarily be an indication that the old specific rule is invalid and that it is now superceded by the new general rule. Effectively, the "Unless otherwise noted" clause of the Essentials rule for items is invoked by the "weapons property rule" of AV. The AV rule is an "otherwise note". :D Yeah, I did a "double check the Compendium" and my eyes glazed over it. Doh! :lol: To me, this seems like a case of the designers from day one wanting the PCs to use the powers through the weapon in order to gain weapon benefits like properties. There hasn't been one rules quote posted so far (including your Esseentials one) which explicitly indicates otherwise. The AV rule, though, is very explicit concerning weapons. Granted, the Essentials rule does give an explicit general items rule and if someone were [B]only[/B] using Essentials rules, then that would be the proper interpretation. But as far as I know, PBP on EnWorld (unless otherwise noted ;)) uses all of the rules. A new general rule would overrule an old general rule, but it wouldn't overrule an old specific rule. Apples and Oranges. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
L4W Discussion Thread V
Top